My Idea: Give Them What They Want

Ken AshfordHealth Care2 Comments

It really seems that a lot of these people protesting Obama's call for health care reform are opposed to government-run health care without realizing that they themselves are on government-run health care which they don't want tampered with.

It's not surprising.  For near 30 years, the right wing has bombarded the citizenry with a simple-to-understand, but not-necessarily-true slogan — i.e., government is bad

Of course, government doesn't have to be bad.  I'll kick it to Toby Ziegler for this one:

Still, so many of our oldest citizens have ingested the message that government doing things is bad.

In fact, by some measures, the elderly have the most skeptical views of government. For instance, in the latest version of the Pew values survey, 64 percent of those over 65 — who are either on Medicare and Social Security or know that they will be soon — said that "when something is run by the government, it is usually inefficient and wasteful" (see page 34 here). That compares to only 43 percent of those age 18 to 29.

Yet Medicare and Social Security are two of the most efficient and beneficial government programs in the history of our country.

You would think there would be cognitive dissonance.  But is there?  No.

So I think that we should do at these townhall meetings is have a show of hands.  If these cranky vets and elderly people who turn up to protest don't want government having anything to do with health care, they should raise their hand.  Someone at the meeting take down their names, and social security numbers, and put them in a database.  They'll receive no veteran's benefits, no social security benefits, no Medicare, no Medicaid.  And they can deal with the insurance companies individually and on their own.

Let's see how they like them apples.

More About The GOP Mobs

Ken AshfordHealth CareLeave a Comment

From today's WaPo chat (with WaPo columnist Ben Pershing):

Oklahoma City, OK: In yesterday's politics chat one of the posters wondered why it was "legal" for vocal critics of the administration to show up at congressional town halls and sometimes shout and yell. Does no one on the left recall eight years under George W. Bush when everywhere he went there were shrieking leftist protestors shouting "Hitler!" and hanging him in effigy? Some folks act like amngry fringe types are uniqie to the right.

Ben Pershing: That is a good point — it's certainly not a new phenomenon to have protesters show up at town halls and other political events and try to disrupt the proceedings. And there were plenty of fringe-y liberals who demonstrated loudly at Bush events. But I'm not sure if there was quite the level of coordination on the left as there is currently on the right, where conservative groups aren't just putting people at Democratic events, but actually encouraging them to yell at lawmakers.

Pershing is right.  To be sure, there was vocal leftest protests at Bush events.  The anger at Bush — especially during the run-up to the Iraq war was palpable.

… but shouts of "Hitler" at Bush?  Hanging of Bush in effigy?  That rarely if ever happened.  And never was Bush shouted down to the point where he (and those he intended to meet with) were virtually silenced.

What's more, as Pershing notes, the left outrage was genuine outrage.  Lobbying groups did not send out messages about how to disrupt town halls.  The left's umbrage back then was a true grassroots protest based on factual information; the right's outrage today is all astroturf, based on misleading lies propogated by lobbying groups and insurance companies pulling the strings behind the scenes.

UPDATE:  Here's a good idea to counter the protesters, Congresspeople.  Hold your town hall meeting in a children's hospital.

UPDATE:  A Tweet from this morning:

Johnmccaintwit080509

Can I Tap That?

Ken AshfordSex/Morality/Family ValuesLeave a Comment

The latest phone craze is too text a friend asking "So when can I tap that?"

It's gotten so popular that there's now a whole website devoted to the questions (and responses).

Some examples:

Me: Hey, when are you gonna let me tap that?
Her: Now?
Me: You sounds uncertain.
Her: Damnit Now! … better?
Me: I'm literally outside your door.

Me: Hey gurlll
Her: Yo.
Me: When you gonna let me tap dat?
Her: Oh dear.
Her: I can't really talk now, I'm running errands.
Me: Sexy errands?
Her: Um what? No.

Me: Hey when you gonna let me tap that?
Her: When you have enough money to afford me
Me: Do you take credit?

Me: Ay, when you gonna let me tap that?
Him: Haha RIGHT NOW
Me: Sweet!
Him: You know lady gaga is a hermaphodite?
Me: Oh god lol, no?
Him: Yeah lol google it
Me: Oh dear. Well, that was a weird turn for the conversation to take.

Me: Hey
Her: Sup?
Me: Just wondering when your gonna let me tap that.
Her: Lol What got in to you
Me: Nothing just wondering
Her: Ok
Me: Sooo?
Her: Well first off I'm married, we live in different states and my ex is your best friend.
Me: Well that just killed the mood.

Her: God I keep having the worst day ever. **** just threw a cup of water at me.
Me: I have a question that could cheer you up.
Her: I doubt it.
Me: When you gonna let me tap dat?
Her: God this day just keeps getting worse and worse.

Me: So when are you going to let me tap that?
Her: Never.
Me: Well that wasn't as fun as I thought it would be.

Me: yo short stack, when u gunna let me tap that?
Her: I refuse to respond to such a primitive comment.
Me: Alright, how about we progress our DNA coding together so to help evolution along?

Me: Ay, when you gonna let me tap that?
Her: Omg what?!?!
Her: Tonight.
Her: Was that to another girl asshole
Me: No, it's for a website

Me: Can I tap that?
Him: huh?
Me: Some website told me to ask you.
Him: Okay; well tell it I said that I would be happy to have you tap it.

The Question Is “Why”

Ken AshfordCrimeLeave a Comment

No meaning can be ascribed to meaningless killings like the ones in Pittsburgh last night.

Yet, the question still remains: "why".  Why would somebody do such a thing?  Revenge against a specific target?  A nut job?

The shooter (who took his own life) left behind an online diary of sorts.  We know why.  He was lonely.  Here is what he wrote on Monday:

"The biggest problem of all is not having relationships or friends, but not being able to achieve and acquire what I desire in those or many other areas.

"Everything stays the same regardless of the effert (sic) I put in. If I had control over my life then I would be happier. But for about the past 30 years, I have not.”

It's all there on his public website (mostly not available anymore).

[UPDATE:  Direct link to the "diary" here – looks like the guy with some racial issues and a little self-obsessed with his "isolation".  Apparently, he never learned (nor was told) that EVERYONE lives a life of quiet desparation, and that has nothing with being single or married, popular or unpopular etc.  Besides, life isn't about the achievement of some goal (social, career, or otherwise), it's about the journey.]

Which raises more "why" questions than it answers.

Screenshot from last "diary" entry:

20090805-mn8cdkqct659xr49uuuy1ghthp

I don't know the guy and I'm not a trained psychologist, but it seems to me that perhaps he was having bad luck with the women because there was something about him which suggested that he could someday be a mass killer.  Some people just have that vibe, you know?

Welcome Home

Ken AshfordNorth KoreaLeave a Comment

Laura Ling's touching and emotional press conference on the tarmac after returning to America following President Clinton's intervention with the North Koreans:

It should be noted that these Americans were freed, we didn't have to give up anything, and no shots were fired.

This, of course, has the rightwingers pissed, apparently because they weren't rescued by Chuck Norris using laser guns.

What’s Wrong With The U.S. Postal Service?

Ken AshfordHealth CareLeave a Comment

Arthur Laffer on CNN:

If you like the Post Office and the Department of Motor Vehicles and you think they’re run well, just wait till you see Medicare, Medicaid and health care done by the government.

Someone needs to point out to Mr. Supply Side that Medicare and Medicaid are done by the government…. now.  They are government programs, and they run well.  So there's no need to try to scare the elderly by warning about how bad that program will become once government takes over.

Yet this kind of blather gets said, and nobody ever stops to correct the speaker.  As President Obama said at an AARP event last week

"…I got a letter the other day from a woman; she said, 'I don't want government-run health care, I don't want socialized medicine, and don't touch my Medicare.' And I wanted to say, well, I mean, that's what Medicare is, is it's a government-run health care plan that people are very happy with. But I think that we've been so accustomed to hearing those phrases that sometimes we can't sort out the myth from the reality."

[UPDATE via Digby, discussing a town hall meeing held by Rep. Gene Green (D-TX):

During the town hall, one conservative activist turns to his fellow attendees and asks them to raise their hands if they “oppose any form of socialized or government-run health care.” Almost all the hands shot up. Rep Green quickly turned the question on the audience and asked, “How many of you have Medicare?” Nearly half the attendees raised their hands, failing to note the irony.

Heh.  And at a recent town hall meeting in Simpsonville, South Carolina, Rep. Robert Inglis (R-SC) was approached by a constituent who demanded that he keep his “government hands out of Medicare.” Inglis tried to explain to the constituent that his coverage is “being provided by the government,” but the constituent refused to believe it. ]

And speaking of separating myth from reality, why is Laffer taking on the Post Office and the DMV?

Now, granted, the DMV in most states isn't the model of efficiency.  And the DMV is an easy punchline for jokes.  But to be honest, my experiences at the DMV haven't been entirely bad.  Not all of them.  Even so, that's not the fault of a the federal government.  That's state government. 

And the U.S. Postal service?  When did the U.S. Post Office become an unquestioned byword for "bad government program"?  For less than 50 cents, I can put an envelope in my mailbox, someone comes to my house (I don't have to call to schedule a pickup), and that letter arrives someplace 2-3 days later.  For under 50 cents!!!

Do people have post office horror stories?  Sure they do.  But they have just as many — if not more — UPS and Fedex/Kinko horror stories.

Frankly, if the government took over health care and it ran as well as the USPS, that would be one damn good government program.

Stats From The Cash-For-Clunkers Program

Ken AshfordEnergy and Conservation, Environment & Global Warming & EnergyLeave a Comment

The Top Ten Cash for Clunkers Trade-Ins:

  1. 1998 Ford Explorer
  2. 1997 Ford Explorer
  3. 1996 Ford Explorer
  4. 1999 Ford Explorer
  5. Jeep Grand Cherokee
  6. Jeep Cherokee
  7. 1995 Ford Explorer
  8. 1994 Ford Explorer
  9. 1997 Ford Windstar
  10. 1999 Dodge Caravan

The Top Ten Cash for Clunkers New Cars:

  1. Ford Focus
  2. Honda Civic
  3. Toyota Corolla
  4. Toyota Prius
  5. Ford Escape
  6. Toyota Camry
  7. Dodge Caliber
  8. Hyundai Elantra
  9. Honda Fit
  10. Chevy Cobalt
[Source]

Smart, money-saving, and good for the environment.

Conservatives are now deriding the C-4-C program as an example of a government program that doesn't work and was mismanaged.  To the extent that there was a government screw-up, it was only because it was so popular.  “Cash for Clunkers” — the government program giving people a $4,500 voucher to trade in an old vehicle for a newer, more fuel efficient one — has been so successful that Congress is considering appropriating more money for it to continue.

Yet Another Reason Why John Bolton Should Shut Up

Ken AshfordForeign Affairs, North Korea, Right Wing Punditry/IdiocyLeave a Comment

So you may have heard that former President Bill Clinton went to North Korea today to negotiate the release of two American journalists being held by the North Koreans.

Arch-conservative and former U.N. Ambassador under Bush, John Bolton, wrote this morning:

Clinton’s Unwise Trip to North Korea

[…]

The point to be made on the Clinton visit is that the knee-jerk impulse for negotiations above all inevitably brings more costs than its advocates foresee. Negotiating from a position of strength, where the benefits to American interests will exceed the costs, is one thing. Negotiating merely for the sake of it, in the face of palpable recent failures, is something else indeed.

The results, this afternoon:

N. Korea Says Two U.S. Journalists Have Been Pardoned

North Korea announced Tuesday that it had pardoned two detained American journalists, hours after former president Bill Clinton met in Pyongyang with reclusive dictator Kim Jong Il as part of an unannounced and highly unusual diplomatic mission to win their freedom.

Kim issued an order “granting a special pardon to the two American journalists who had been sentenced to hard labour in accordance with Article 103 of the Socialist Constitution and releasing them,” the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) said.

Right, John.  Wasted trip.  Bad idea.

Obama Be Killing Us All, Like The Nazis

Ken AshfordHealth Care, Right Wing Punditry/Idiocy2 Comments

One of my favorite Renew America columnists, Marie Jon, has taken on Obamacare.  You know it's going to be fun just from the title:

Obama's Advance Care Planning: code words for 'euthanasia'

Get it?  "Code words".  He doesn't come right out and say "euthanasia", because that would be too obvious.  Marie explains:

President Barack Obama has proposed that every American's medical records be set before mindless bureaucrats who will determine their fate. The eyes of scrutiny have been set into motion, and the American public had best beware. This is not about healthcare, or a choice to keep your private medical plan or doctor. It is out-and-out trickery and is evil, and the effects could be devastating.

So far, she's doing a voiceover for some horror film trailer.  But is it scary enough?  No, apparently not:

Let us not forget what happened just prior to implementation of the Nazis' "Final Solution." They established a policy of direct medical killing. They arranged the means through medical channels whereby their medical decisions were carried out by doctors and their assistants. They called their program euthanasia. The word was mere camouflage; it was the murder of innocent people.

Right, the Nazi called it "euthanasia", but it was actually murdering innocent people.  Those clever Nazis.  

These diabolical murderers of the Nazi era based their justification for direct medical killing on the simple concept that certain people are unworthy of life. They put together protocols by which they carried out their principle. Eventually they would kill impaired children and adults.

Not to mention millions of unimpaired children and adults, but that's just nitpicking on my part.

By the way, three paragraphs into an article critical of Obama's health plan, and 66% of it is Nazi references.  Reductio ad Hilterum much?

If ObamaCare is passed, the same insidious protocols — "Advance Care Planning" — will be set into place to cut the cost of his massive government healthcare program. Our senior citizens will receive mandated appointments for counseling that will determine if they receive minimal medical treatment or are told to go home and die. They will be offered assistance and instructions on how to take their own lives.

Actually, the section Marie is referring to is entitled "Advance Care Planning Consultation" — Marie simply left off the last word because it doesn't jibe with her position that it will offer "instructions on how to take their own lives".  I would call that "deceptive", wouldn't you?

In fact, if you read the damn thing – something that Marie, the self-described "Renew America analyst" hasn't done — you would be hard-pressed to find anything that remotely suggests that people are "told to go home and die".

Oh, that's right.  Obama is using "code words":

Conservative talk radio and writers for the new media have been in the forefront, warning their fellow countrymen about the true character and nature of this "historic presidency." As bad as things appeared when Obama was elected, no one could have possibly foreseen this coming. Advance Care Planning is code words for a mandated medical death sentence.

I guess it is pretty easy to criticize anybody's health care plan or policy if you take the position that the words they use don't mean what they normally mean.

Maybe, for example, "Marie Jon, RA analyst" is code for "Marie Jon, lunatic wingnut who doesn't bother to research what she's writing about, but who merely mimics conservative talk show jocks and other conservative think tanks who are heavily funded by the insurance industry".  It's all code words here, people.

The Democrat Party is willing to give to a cold and calculating president the power to say who lives and dies. The radicalized party has sold out their countrymen and granted Obama as much latitude to please his unquenchable anger towards America as he sees fit.

Yes, that's it.  It's all a big plot by 60% of Americans to kill themselves.  And Obama is going to spend the rest of his presidency behind the Oval Office desk creating to piles of papers: those who live, and those he'll kill.

Betsy McCaughey, a former Lt. Governor of New York State, and a prominent patient advocate, is an outspoken critic of the health bills being pushed through Congress. She has indicated that what is tucked away in the President's HealthCare bill must be fully exposed.

Yes, Betsy McCaughey.  For those of you who don't know or remember, she blasted the part of Obama's stimulus bill a few months back, saying it created "one new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology." McCaughey further claimed that the national coordinator "will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective." She highlighted the word "guide" from the stimulus legislation, writing: "The goal is to reduce costs and ‘guide’ your doctor’s decisions."

Unfortunately, McCaughey showed her true idiocy, by not realizing that the "National Coordinator of Health Information Technology" was not created by Obama.  The office has been in existence for nearly five years. In fact, it was President Bush who created it by executive order in April 2004.  And that "guide" language in the new law was virtually identical to the language in Bush's executive order in 2004.

This is the person that Marie Jon looks up to as an "expert" to criticize Obama's health care plan.

It is time that the men and women in our legislative halls call this man out for who he is. Michael Steele, Chairman of the GOP National Committee, must speak out immediately.

Every Republican in the House and Senate should be on the steps of the White House decrying the president's insane policies which will — make no mistake — include the act of euthanasia. He must be stopped immediately. This is no longer a question of "politics as usual."

But it is "hysteria as usual".

One wonders what Marie Jon will do if Obama's health care plan comes to pass, and it turns out that elderly people aren't told that the must die.  What will Marie Jon do then?  Apologize?  Admit she was wrong?  Stop writing columns because of her shame and embarrassment?

I doubt it.

Let's jump to Marie's closing paragraphs:

From the very beginning, Obama has been as a demigod — fraudulently usurping as much power as he can. Why anyone is kowtowing to him at this point is a question we should be asking our congressional representatives. In no wise has this well-dressed and well-spoken Chicago street organizer given us a moment of peace since he assumed the Oval Office through clever deception. Enough is enough.

We have reached a critical turning point when we cannot trust the President of the United States to tell us the truth. In too many instances, he has become a double-talking, bald-faced liar.

I respectfully suggest that the one committing deception is the one claiming that Obama wants to kill Americans — with nothing other than blind conjecture to support that claim.  And who can't even properly report the correct name of the very law she's criticizing: Advance Care Planning Consultation.

Okay, maybe "deception" isn't what's operating in Marie's mind.  Maybe it's just the absence of common sense.  Or, put bluntly, stupidity.

Blue America

Ken AshfordDemocrats, RepublicansLeave a Comment

An analysis of Gallup Poll Daily tracking data from the first six months of 2009 was released to day, on the subject of political party affiliation.

The accompanying map shows each state's relative party strength  in the first half of 2009, which primarily covers the time since Barack Obama took office as president. States in which one of the parties enjoys a 10 or more percentage point advantage in leaned identification are considered solid supporters of that party. States with between a five- and nine-point advantage are considered leaning toward that party, and states with less than a five-point advantage for one of the parties are considered competitive.

O7tmhdlhheg5rgn4k-cyhw

Not much red there, huh?

Here's the state-by-state breakdown:

Iiaacldwbuw5s4der5kxnq

Sarah and Todd Palin To Get Divorced?

Ken AshfordElection 20121 Comment

Normally, I wouldn't take notice of an "exclusive breaking" story reporter by a blogger, but The Immoral Minority, and Alaskan blog did beat out the regular media by first reporting that Palin was McCain's VP pick, and it did beat out the regular miedia by first reporting that Palin was resigning.  So the guy, who works as an assistant teacher in a kindergarden, apparently has some connections.  And now he writes:

According to my source, Sarah is finished with Todd and has decided to end their marriage.

She has purchased land in Montana (I wonder whose donations paid for that?), and may be considering moving herself and the children as far away from Alaska as she can get.

Do you remember all of that talk about her missing wedding ring during the three part going away picnics? Well it turns out that ring now sleeps with the fishes. Apparently in a fit of anger Sarah stripped the ring from her finger and tossed it into a lake.

The Palins are not happy:

Palin's lawyer, Thomas Van Flein, wrote a letter to the blogger, asking "if you want to be served with the summons and complaint at the kindergarten where you assist or at your residence."

Gryphen laughed off the threat, telling Alaska Report, "Nothing that I wrote in my post was meant to be malicious. I trust my source and simply reported what I had been told.
Threatening to serve legal papers to an educator in a room full of five year olds? Now that is malicious."

Palin's spokeswoman issued a statement denying the divorce story on Saturday.

To be continued….

Dionne’s Advice To The GOP LIkely To Be Ignored

Ken AshfordRepublicans1 Comment

Noting that only 28% of Americans have a favorable image of the Republican Party, E.J. Dionne Jr. has a good column today. The GOP would be in better shape, he writes, if it wasn't "defined by extremist voices who have faced little push-back from its leaders."

After recognizing the "birthers," the right-wing race-baiting, the insistence that health care reform will lead the government to murder senior citizens, and last week's dust-up over whether the GOP has been "taken over by Southerners," Dionne concludes:

In the short term, these tussles and rumblings may not matter much. The country is focused on judging what the Democrats are doing with the power they hold. The path that politics will take depends largely on the outcome of the health-care battle and the direction of the economy.

But to take advantage of the opportunities that might come their way, Republicans will have to make themselves an acceptable alternative. They have not done this yet. Facing down extremism and breaking out of the party's regional enclave would be good places to start.

He's right of course, but the problem he ignnores is that Republicans can't face down extremism, in part because the party has invested so much time and energy cultivating an angry GOP base (see post below).

In the meantime, Democratic leaders feel blessed to have such reckless and unhinged rivals.  I know I do.