Two Pictures Of A Thousand Words

Ken AshfordHealth CareLeave a Comment

Nate Silver at 538 did something kind of clever:

Gallup did something pretty cool in connection with their latest health care survey, which was to provide the verbatim responses (.xls) of the rationales given by people who would tell their Congressman to vote for or against the current health care bills, respectively.

I ran the responses through Wordle, a word-cloud generating tool, omitting certain words that were parts of speech or were otherwise nongermane.

Here are the results:

4434349896_31cc767677_o
4433576135_7614c92f95_o 

Obviously, the top picture represents those who want health care reform, with the plain argument "People…need….insurance". 

The bottom picture represents the anti's — concerns about the "government cost".  Interestingly, the bottom picture represents a sort of misunderstanding about health care reform.  It's not really about a government program (sadly).  But those opposed to it, largely misled by the Republican messaging over the past few months, seem to think that it is.

In any event, it clearly shows the mindset of the polarized view on healthcare.  Need vs. Cost.  Pay vs. Afford.  Etc.

Broadcast News Redux

Ken AshfordRight Wing Punditry/IdiocyLeave a Comment

You know that scene from the movie Broadcast News where Holly Hunter learns that William Hurt's teary interview was actually fabricated, i.e., that he could cry on cue?

Seems like there's a little but of that happening over at Fox News.  From Howard Kurtz, via Kevin Drum, we learn about Glenn Beck's "on-air pyrotechnics":

Some staffers say they have watched rehearsals, on internal monitors, in which Beck has teared up or paused at the same moments as he later did during the show. Asked about this, Balfe responded sharply: "Glenn reacts the same way to issues whether he knows people are watching or not, and is proud to show his emotions, unlike the cowardly, two-faced critics who hide behind anonymity."

Yeah, but reacting the same way in rehearsal and then again moments later when the cameras are rolling?  There's no way to spin this, Balfe.  Glenn Beck's "natural" on-air reactions are staged.

Tom Toles Is Right

Ken AshfordEconomy & Jobs & Deficit, Health CareLeave a Comment

Just wait a couple years and this will happen:

C_03152010_520-thumb-454x371
By the way, I'm well-aware that health care reform is — finally, after months of debating — on the doorstep.  And whether it passes the House or not — well, Democrats think they have the votes, but nobody knows for sure.  Obama is working the phones getting the Democrats in line; Move On and the SEIU are making threats to back other candidates if they don't.

It's going to be close, but statistician golden boy Nate Silver is "cautiously optimistic" that the Democrats have the 216 votes they need.

And for what it's worth, Intrade puts the chances of passage (by both houses) at 68%.

ClosingChart

Checking Back In With The Texas School Board

Ken AshfordEducationLeave a Comment

Yup, they're rewriting history:

Teachers in Texas will be required to cover the Judeo-Christian influences of the nation’s Founding Fathers, but not highlight the philosophical rationale for the separation of church and state. Curriculum standards also will describe the U.S. government as a “constitutional republic,” rather than “democratic,” and students will be required to study the decline in value of the U.S. dollar, including the abandonment of the gold standard.

“We have been about conservatism versus liberalism,” said Democrat Mavis Knight of Dallas, explaining her vote against the standards. “We have manipulated strands to insert what we want it to be in the document, regardless as to whether or not it’s appropriate.”

Following three days of impassioned and acrimonious debate, the board gave preliminary approval to the new standards with a 10-5 party line vote. A final vote is expected in May, after a public comment period that could produce additional amendments and arguments.

Decisions by the board — made up of lawyers, a dentist and a weekly newspaper publisher among others — can affect textbook content nationwide because Texas is one of publishers’ biggest clients.

Ultraconservatives wielded their power over hundreds of subjects this week, introducing and rejecting amendments on everything from the civil rights movement to global politics. Hostilities flared and prompted a walkout Thursday by one of the board’s most prominent Democrats, Mary Helen Berlanga of Corpus Christi, who accused her colleagues of “whitewashing” curriculum standards.

Also, they refused to teach students that the Constitution says that one religion can't be preferred over another, or that Hispanics died at the Alamo.  Thomas Jefferson's emphasis in The Enlightment gets replaced by John Calvin.  Reagan's prominence is promoted.  More here.

UPDATE:  Here's the full List of Shame:

  • Religious conservatives on the board killed a proposed standard that would have required high school government students to “examine the reasons the Founding Fathers protected religious freedom in America by barring government from promoting or disfavoring any particular religion over all others.” That means the board rejected teaching students about the most fundamental constitutional protection for religious freedom in America. (3/11/10)
  • Even as board members continued to demand that students learn about “American exceptionalism,” they stripped Thomas Jefferson from a world history standard about the influence of Enlightenment thinkers on political revolutions from the 1700s to today. In Jefferson’s place, the board’s religious conservatives inserted Thomas Aquinas and John Calvin. They also removed the reference to “Enlightenment ideas” from the standard, requiring that students simply learn about the “writings” of various thinkers (including Calvin and Aquinas). (3/11/10)
  • Board conservatives succeeded in censoring the word “capitalism” in the standards, requiring that the term for that economic system be called “free enterprise” throughout all social studies courses. Board members such as Terri Leo and Ken Mercer charged that “capitalism” is a negative term used by “liberal professors in academia.” (3/11/10)
  • The board removed the concepts of “justice” and “responsibility for the common good” from a list of characteristics of good citizenship for Grades 1-3. (The proposal to remove “equality” failed.) (1/14/10)

  • Social conservatives on the board removed Santa Barraza from a Grade 7 Texas history standard on Texans who have made contributions to the arts because they objected to one of her (many) paintings — one including a depiction of a woman’s exposed breasts. Yet some of Barraza’s works had been displayed in the Texas Governor’s Mansion during the gubernatorial administration of George W. Bush in the 1990s. (3/11/10)
  • The board stripped Dolores Huerta, cofounder of United Farm Workers of America, from a Grade 3 list of “historical and contemporary figures who have exemplified good citizenship.” Conservative board members said Huerta is not a good role model for third-graders because she’s a socialist. But they did not remove Hellen Keller from the same standard even though Keller was a staunch socialist. Don McLeroy, a conservative board member who voted to remove Huerta, had earlier added W.E.B. DuBois so the Grade 2 standards. McLeroy apparently didn’t know that DuBois had joined the Communist Party in the year before he died. (1/14/10)
  • In an absurd attempt to excuse Joseph McCarthy’s outrageous witchhunts in the 1950s, far-right board members succeeded in adding a requirement that students learn about “communist infiltration in U.S. government” during the Cold War. (Board member Don McLeroy has even claimed outright that Joseph McCarthy has been “vindicated,” a contention not supported by mainstream scholarship.) (1/15/10)
  • The board voted in January to remove children’s book author Bill Martin Jr. from a Grade 3 standard about significant writers and artists because members confused the author of Brown Bear, Brown Bear, What Do You See? with another Bill Martin who had written a book about Marxism. An embarrassed board reinserted Martin into the Grade 3 standards in March. (3/11/10)
  • Board members added Friedrich von Hayek to a standard in the high school economics course even though some board members acknowledged that they had no idea who the Austrian-born economist even was. (3/11/10)
  • The board added a requirement that American history students learn about conservative heroes and icons such as Phyllis Schlafly, the Heritage Foundation and the Moral Majority. The board included no similar standard requiring students to learn about individuals and organizations simply because they are liberal. (1/15/10)
  • Board conservatives passed a standard for the eighth-grade U.S. history class requiring students to learn about the ideas in Jefferson Davis’ inaugural address as president of the Confederacy during the Civil War. (1/14/10)
  • In a high school government standard about “the importance of the expression of different points of view in a democratic republic,” the board added a requirement that students learn about the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms. (3/11/10)
  • The board’s bloc of social conservatives tried to water down instruction on the history of the civil rights movement. One board amendment, for example, would have required students to learn that the civil rights movement created “unreasonable expectations for equal outcomes.” That failed to pass. Other amendments passed in January minimized the decades of struggle by women and ethnic minorities to gain equal and civil rights. (Board member Don McLeroy even claimed that women and minorities owed thanks to men and “the majority” for their rights. Earlier in the revision process, a conservative appointed by McLeroy to a curriculum team had complained about an “over-representation of minorities” in the standards.) Under pressure from civil rights groups, the board partially reversed those earlier amendments. (3/11/10)
  • The board’s right-wing faction removed references to “democratic” (or “representative democracy”) when discussing the U.S. form of government. The board’s majority Republicans changed those references to “constitutional republic.” Board member Cynthia Dunbar also won approval for changing references to “democratic societies” to “societies with representative government.” (3/11/10)
  • Religious conservatives stripped from the high school sociology course a standard having students “differentiate between sex and gender as social constructs and determine how gender and socialization interact.” Board member Barbara Cargill argued that the standard would lead students to learn about “transexuals, transvestites and who knows what else.” She told board members she had conducted a “Google search” to support her argument. Board member Ken Mercer complained that the amendment was about “sex.” The board consulted no sociologists during the debate. (3/11/10)
  • Board member Barbara Cargill proposed a standard to the high school economics course requiring students to “analyze the decline in the value of the U.S. dollar since the inception of the Federal Reserve System since 1913.” After debate, the board passed a revised standard that requires students to “analyze the decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, including the abandonment of the gold standard.” References to 1913 and the Federal Reserve System were dropped. The board consulted no economists during the debate. (3/11/10)
  • The board approved a standard requiring students to learn about “any unintended consequences” of the Great Society, affirmative action and Title IX. (3/11/10)
  • In a high school U.S. history standard on musical genres that have been popular over time, the board’s bloc of social conservatives removed “hip hop,” equating this broad genre with “gangsta rap.” (3/11/10)
  • The board voted to use “BC” and “AD” rather than “BCE” and “CE” in references to dates in the history classes. That means students going off to college won’t be familiar with what has become an increasingly common standard for dates. (3/10/10)
  • The board removed Oscar Romero, a prominent Roman Catholic archbishop who was assassinated in 1980 (as he was celebrating Mass) by rightists in El Salvador, from a world history standard about leaders who led resistance to political oppression. Romero, they argued, wasn’t of the same stature as others listed in the standards: Nelson Mandela and Mohandas Gandhi. One board member argued that “he didn’t have his own movie like the others.” He quickly reversed himself — the film Romero, based on the archbishop’s life, was released in 1989 and starred actor Raul Julia in the title role. (3/10/10)
  • The board’s right-wing faction removed a reference to propaganda as a factor in U.S. entry into World War I. (The role of propaganda on behalf of both the Allies and Central Powers in swaying public opinion in the United States is well-documented. Republican Pat Hardy noted that her fellow board members were “rewriting history” with that and similar changes.) (1/15/10)
  • The board changed a “imperialism” to “expansionism” in a U.S. history course standard about American acquisition of overseas territories in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Board conservatives argued that what the United States did at the time was not the same as European imperialism. (1/15/10)

Corey Haim Dead From PRESCRIPTION Drugs

Ken AshfordIn PassingLeave a Comment

I've taken prescribed medication.  So has everybody else I've ever met in this world.

And yet NONE of them managed to accidentally overdose themselves.

Why is it that movie stars (and former movie stars) seem to lack the ability to take the prescribed dose?  Are the instructions on the side of the bottle too complicated?  Do they need seminars on how to take pills properly?

Anyway, Corey Haim is dead.  Which means that for the next ten years (or until he dies), Corey Feldman is going to hear nothing but, "Hey!  It's you!  I thought you were dead, man!"

Rush Says He’ll Leave U.S. If Health Care Passes

Ken AshfordHealth Care, Right Wing Punditry/Idiocy1 Comment

From Think Progress:

CALLER: If the health care bill passes, where would you go for health care yourself? And the second part of that is, what would happen to the doctors, do they have to participate in the federal program, or could they opt out of it? […]

LIMBAUGH: My guess in even in Canada and even in the UK, doctors have opted out. And once they’ve opted, they can’t see anybody Medicare, Medicaid, or what will become the exchanges. They have to have a clientele of private patients that will pay them a retainer and it’ll be a very small practice. I don’t know if that’s been outlawed in the Senate bill. I don’t know. I’ll just tell you this, if this passes and it’s five years from now and all that stuff gets implemented — I am leaving the country. I’ll go to Costa Rica.

Costa Rica?  Uh, Rush?  Did you know that Costa Rica has universal health care?  It's paid for by the government; you can opt out if you want.  And it works pretty good, too!:

Costa Rica, a small developing country of 4.6 million people, in Central America, surprised many people by having a health care ranking by the World Health Organization higher than the United States. The life expectancy of people in Costa Rica is higher than the U.S. and the infant mortality rate is approximately the same. What is incredible is they are spending $6,000 less per capita than the U.S. and they are covering all of the people.

This is the same Rush Limbaugh who praised the health care he received in Hawaii (following a heart attackish thing)…. without knowing that Hawaii has what amounts to universal health care (aka "socialized medicine").  The guy is two-for-two!

Still, Rush leaving the U.S.?  Of course it is hyperbole, but the remote chance that he will stay true to his word is incentive enough to get health care reform passed.

Good News From The Texas Board Of Education

Ken AshfordEducation1 Comment

If you didn't know already, Texas has always played a vital role in textbooks used throughout the nation.  The reasons for this are economic: Texas is the nation’s second-largest textbook market and one of the few biggies where the state picks what books schools can buy rather than leaving it up to the whims of local districts.  This means that publishers that get their books approved can count on millions of dollars in sales.

As a result, the Lone Star State has outsized influence over the reading material used in classrooms nationwide, since publishers craft their standard textbooks based on the specs of the biggest buyers. Put simply, publishers will do whatever it takes to get on the Texas list.

That's why the Texas Board of Education is a closely-watched body, and why it has been a cause of concern for the past several years.  The TBE has been stacked with a bunch of neo-conservatives, most notably a guy named Don McLeroy, who has served on the Board since 1999.

Among the highlights of McLeroy's time on the Texas board are:

  • In 2008, he objected to including Chinese literature in English classes: "[Y]ou really don't want Chinese books with a bunch of crazy Chinese words in them. Why should you take a child's time trying to learn a word that they'll never ever use again?" He conceded some terms, such as "chow mein," might be useful, the San Antonio Express-News reported.

  • He said during a 2008 debate over science standards: "Is understanding of evolution 'vital' to the understanding of biology? No."

  • Last year he instructed curriculum writers to "read the latest on [Joseph] McCarthy — he was basically vindicated."

  • He described his textbook evaluation process this way to the Washington Monthly: "The way I evaluate history textbooks is first I see how they cover Christianity and Israel. Then I see how they treat Ronald Reagan–he needs to get credit for saving the world from communism and for the good economy over the last twenty years because he lowered taxes."

  • He explained why minority groups should be thankful to the majority for civil rights:

  • Finally, McLeroy successfully offered an amendment to U.S. history standards to require students to be able to "describe the causes and key organizations and individuals of the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s, including Phyllis Schafly, the Contract with America, the Heritage Foundation, the Moral Majority, and the National Rifle Association." There is no liberal counterpart clause in the current draft of the standards.

The "good news" is that he was defeated in a recent election
 
Unfortunately, he'll still be serving another year, and the Texas Board will be considering some of his more outlandish proposals.  But at least a dose of sanity has returned to the body with his ouster, and bodes well for the future of public school textbooks.  (Those who are homeschooled, on the other hand, continue to have a harder time finding scientific accurate textbooks).

I Just Might Watch SNL One More Time

Ken AshfordPopular CultureLeave a Comment

CNN:

Betty-white Betty White fans, your prayers have been answered. The former "Golden Girl" will appear on "Saturday Night Live" in the near future, she confirmed to PEOPLE at Elton John's annual Oscars viewing party on Sunday night.

Fans have been clamoring for White, 88, to do "SNL" — an idea she called "ridiculous" just a few weeks ago — ever since her comic turn in a Snickers ad during the Super Bowl. One Facebook page devoted to the cause has attracted half a million fans.

When asked by PEOPLE, "Are you doing 'Saturday Night Live'?" she answered, "Yes," even if she remains perplexed by the groundswell of support.

"I don't know why or how," she says, "but it's been wonderful."

White didn't offer any details about the "SNL" gig, and it remains unclear when she will appear — or what it will entail.

Nice to see a resurrgence in her career.

UPDATE:  Apparently, it's an appearance, not a hosting gig.  Betty is 88, and presumably, would like to see 89.

Political Dictionary

Ken AshfordDemocrats, RepublicansLeave a Comment

"Obstructionism," only refers to Democratic minorities opposing Republican proposals.

"Tyranny" is found when an elected Democratic majority passes legislation that Republicans don't like.

"Reconciliation" describes a Senate process that Republicans are allowed to use to overcome Democratic "obstructionism."

"Terrorism" refers to acts of political violence committed by people who aren't white guys.

"Bipartisanship" is found when Democrats agree to pass Republican legislation.

"Big government" describes a dangerous phenomenon to be avoided, except in cases relating to reproductive rights or gays.

"Treason" refers to Democrats criticizing a Republican administration during a war.

"Patriotism" refers to Republicans criticizing a Democratic administration during a war.

"Fiscal responsibility" is a national priority related to keeping our deficit in check, which only applies when Republicans are in the minority.

"Parliamentarian" is a seemingly independent official on the Hill who Senate Republicans are allowed to fire when the GOP disapproves of his/her rulings.

"Government-run health care" doesn't refer to popular government-run health care programs like Medicare.

"The heartland" is the most wonderful place in America, even if no conservative pundit would be caught dead living there.

"Serving your country" is honorable if you're a Republican, but a subject of derision when Democrats do it.

[H/t Steve Benen and Kos]

Oldest Living American Dies; Runner-Up Then Dies

Ken AshfordRandom MusingsLeave a Comment

Daisey Bailey, who was 113 years, 342 days, died Sunday, enjoying only a few hours as the Oldest Living American.  (Well, perhaps "enjoying" is not the right word).

Daisey became the Oldest Living American on Sunday morning when Mary Josephine Ray (of Westmoreland NH), who was then certified as the oldest person living in the United States, died at age 114 years, 294 days.

So now the title has passed to Neva Morris, of Ames, Iowa, at age 113 years, 216 days.  Ms. Morris is understandably nervous.

Full story.

Forget Someone?

Ken AshfordIn PassingLeave a Comment

Why, yes.  The Academy "forgot"….

Farrah Fawcett (who was phenonmenal in Extremities)
Bea Arthur
Ricardo Montelban….

Why weren't they included?  Not an oversight.  They just didn't make the cut:

The In Memoriam segment can be the most moving part of the Oscar telecast. It’s also the toughest to produce.

"It is the single most troubling element of the Oscar show every year," says Bruce Davis, executive director of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. "Because more people die each year than can possibly be included in that segment."

Davis’ office keeps a running list of academy members and others in the movie business who have passed since the previous year’s segment was compiled. Then, a few weeks before the awards, he and a small committee of academy officials whittle the list of more than 100 names down to the 30 or so folks who will be included in the show’s memorial — from the famous faces viewers at home are sure to recognize to the behind-the-scenes workers familiar only to academy members.

"It gets close to agonizing by the end," Davis says of the annual meeting. "You are dropping people who the public knows. It’s just not comfortable."

Oscar’s In Memoriam montage began in the early 1990s and other awards shows followed suit, including the Screen Actors Guild Awards, Grammys and Emmys — all of which go through the same painful process every year.

"It’s a killer because we have hundreds of members that pass each year and we can’t get them all in," says SAG Awards producer Kathy Connell.

The film academy gives its final list of in-memoriam honorees to the producer of the segment just days before the big show. Chuck Workman, who is producing the memorial montage for Sunday’s telecast, says he was working with a temporary list until last week.

Many of the names made the final cut, he says, but some did not.

"It’s a constant balance for the academy," says Workman, who has 20 years of experience making film montages for the Oscar show. "They do try their best, but there’s only so many spots."

Uh-huh.  So that's why Arthur Canton, Public Relations, was included, but Maurice Jarre (9 Oscar nominations and 3 wins), Henry Gibson (nominated for his work in Nashville), Farrah Fawcett, Bea Arthur and Ricardo Montelban were not.

The Razzie Winners

Ken AshfordPopular CultureLeave a Comment

Forget the Oscars.  This weekend was also the "Worst of Hollywood" awards, known as the Razzies.  Here are the "winners" (or "losers", depending on your point of view):

Worst Picture of 2009:
Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen
(Aka Trannies, Too)
(Dreamworks/Paramount)

Worst Actress of 2009:
Sandra Bullock
All About Steve

Worst Actor(s) of 2009:
All Three Jonas Brothers
Jonas Brothers: The 3-D Concert Experience

Worst Screen Couple:
Sandra Bullock & Bradley Cooper
All About Steve

Worst Supporting Actress:
Sienna Miller
G.I. JOE: THE RISE OF COBRA

Worst Supporting Actor:
Billy Ray Cyrus
HANNAH MONTANA: THE MOVIE

Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel
(Combined Category for 2009):
Land of The Lost
(Universal Pictures)

Worst Director:
Michael Bay
TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN (aka TRANNIES, TOO)

Worst Screenplay:
Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen
Written by Ehren Kruger & Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman,
Based on Hasbro’s Transformers Action Figures

Ironically, this is the first time in the 30 years of the Razzies that an actor or actress has won for "Worst Actress" while also winning the Oscar for "Best Actress".

And Sandra Bullock, classy as ever, actually showed up at the Razzies to get her award: