So Wrong In So Many Ways

Ken AshfordRandom MusingsLeave a Comment

Out of Florida:

Florida Highway Patrol troopers say a two-vehicle crash Tuesday at Mile Marker 21 on Cudjoe Key was caused by a 37-year-old woman driver who was shaving her bikini area while her ex-husband took the wheel from the passenger seat.

"She said she was meeting her boyfriend in Key West and wanted to be ready for the visit," Trooper Gary Dunick said.

Obviously, shaving your bikini area while driving is a no-no.

But what I would like to know is… why is your exhsband accompanying you to a date with your boyfriend?

Palin Slips Up And Gives Kudos To Canadian Health Care

Ken AshfordHealth CareLeave a Comment

Oops.  Sarah gave a little talky-talk and something slipped out:

The vocal opponent of health care reform in the U.S. steered largely clear of the topic except to reveal a tidbit about her life growing up not far from Whitehorse.

"We used to hustle over the border for health care we received in Canada," she said. "And I think now, isn't that ironic."

I wouldn't use the word "ironic", Sarah.  I would use the word "hypocritical".

It must have been nice for the Palin family to slip across the Alaska-Canada border and get health care from Canada.  Unfortunately, most Americans don't live that close to Canada.

Sarah got hers; why is she against you getting yours?

UPDATE:  A more complete quote can be found here:

“My first five years of life we spent in Skagway, Alaska, right there by Whitehorse (180km away. see map). Believe it or not – this was in the ‘60s – we used to hustle on over the border for health care that we would receive in Whitehorse. I remember my brother, he burned his ankle in some little kid accident thing and my parents had to put him on a train and rush him over to Whitehorse and I think, isn’t that kind of ironic now. Zooming over the border, getting health care from Canada."

What?  And he wasn't submitted to a death panel?

Sentence Of The Day

Ken AshfordBloggingLeave a Comment

Jon Chait found it:

Today's Wall Street Journal editorial page has one of those sentences that make the Wall Street Journal editorial page such a daily delight: "Last week President Obama sanctioned 'reconciliation,' a complex tactic that would jam ObamaCare into law on sheer power politics." The beautiful thing about this sentence is that it has no argument (nor is there any support for the argument in the sentences that surround it.) It's sheer hand-waving, an attempt to muster every adjective in the writer's power to make the process of voting sound frightening and sinister.

Likewise, I could write, "This morning, controversial foreign billionaire media boss Rupert Murdoch gave his cronies the go-ahead to chop down and mutilate hundreds of trees, pulverize the carcasses until they were rendered unrecognizable, and then order their underlings to fill the pages with propaganda for the business class, with any refusal to comply punished by the forfeiture of wages and access to health care." But that would be a fairly slanted way to describe the process of publishing a newspaper.

That's a pretty loaded sentence from the WSJ.  Let's break it down.

"Last week President Obama sanctioned 'reconcilation'…."  Sanctioned?  Really?  Does reconcilation, a process that has been in existence for decades need Obama's sanction?

"….a complex tactic…."  Actually, it's not all that complex.

"…that would jam ObamaCare into law on sheer power politics"  Jam… on sheer power politics?  WTF?  It's a majority vote, hardly anything "jamming" about that, since that's how all laws are passed.

Oscar Winners: How Did I Do?

Ken AshfordBloggingLeave a Comment

RIGHT

BEST PICTURE (The Hurt Locker)
BEST ACTOR (
Jeff BridgesCrazy Heart)
BEST ACTRESS (
Sandra Bullock, The Blind Side)
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR (
Christoph WaltzInglourious Basterds)
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS (
Mo’NiquePrecious)

BEST DIRECTOR (Kathryn BigelowThe Hurt Locker)
BEST SONG (“The Weary Kind,” Crazy Heart, T-Bone Burnett & Ryan Bingham)
BEST ANIMATED FILM (
Up)
BEST DOCUMENTARY (
The Cove)
BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY  (Avatar)
BEST EDITING (The Hurt Locker)
BEST VISUAL EFFECTS (Avatar)
BEST ART DIRECTION (Avatar)
BEST MAKEUP (Star Trek)
BEST DOCUMENTARY SHORT (
Music by Prudence)

WRONG

Best Foreign Language Film
WINNER: El Secreto do Sus Ojos (Argentina)

My pick: Ajami (Israel)

Best Score
WINNER:
Up
My pick:
Sherlock Holmes

Best Original Screenplay
WINNER: Mark Boal, The Hurt Locker

My pick: Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds

Best Adapted Screenplay
WINNER:  Geoffrey Fletcher, Precious
My pick: Jason Reitman & Sheldon Turner, Up in the Air

Best Sound Mixing
WINNER:
The Hurt Locker
My pick: Avatar

Best Sound Editing
WINNER: The Hurt Locker
My pick: Star Trek

Best Costume Design
WINNER: The Young Victoria
My pick: Coco Before Chanel

Best Live-Action Short
WINNER: The New Tenants

My pick: Instead of Abracadabra

Best Animated Short
WINNER: Logorama

My pick: A Matter of Loaf and Death

***********

15 out of 24.  Not bad.  I got all the "major" awards.  Would like to have done better on the screenplays…..

Bad Analogy Of The Month

Ken AshfordHealth CareLeave a Comment

The Managing Editor of World Nut Net Daily, David Kupelian, has some thoughts about health care reform:

The spectacle of a far leftist president literally forcing socialized medicine down the throat of an unwilling center-right America is…..

I love how idiots use the word "literally" when they literally mean "figuratively".

But let's back up and start again….

The spectacle of a far leftist president literally forcing socialized medicine down the throat of an unwilling center-right America is reminiscent, perhaps more than any other contemporary metaphor, of date rape.

Uhh……… no.

For one thing, the legislation has been deliberating heathcare reform for over a year now, openly and in public.  And when/if it passes Congress, it will be done in accordance with the laws and rules and procedures now in place.  Doesn't sound anything like "date rape" (and certain not "date rape" by Obama to me).

“You’re So Vain” Mystery Still A Mystery

Ken AshfordRandom MusingsLeave a Comment

Okay, so despite what I blogged about a week or so ago, record producer David Geffen is apparently not the subject of Carly Simon's "You're So Vain".

This comes from Dick Ebersol, who

So apparently, it's someone else name David.
 
2922658_01

The Spoiled, Self-Serving Pricks Of AIG

Ken AshfordEconomy & Jobs & DeficitLeave a Comment

The employees at AIG's Financial Products division — the very unit whose trading had hastened the insurance giant's collapse and help send the U.S. economy in a downward spiral — have absolutely no sense of humility.

Having done, by all accounts, the worst possible job they could possibly do, these clowns are still getting about $100 million, the last installment of which is to be paid out this month.

One has to wonder if any of these d-bags are contrite.  The short answer is "no".  In fact, as this Washington Post article points out, they have nothing but disdain for the American taxpayer who came alone and saved their ass:

The employees said that the corporate leaders who had driven the firm into the ground were already gone from the company. Those who had remained behind to help clean up the mess and repay the taxpayer bailout were due their compensation, they told Pasciucco.

“You made a commitment to us, and we made a commitment to you. And for anybody to look beyond that, as the politics and the media are at the moment, is missing the point,” said an employee. “You can’t expect us to just roll over and ignore that commitment because there is a bunch of immoral bigots that intend us to do something different. It’s not going to happen.”

Another was even more irate, lashing out at the public for scapegoating AIG employees. “To be honest with you, I really hope it blows up. I think the U.S. taxpayer deserves to lose a trillion dollars over this thing for the way they have behaved.”

And then he turned on politicians who had joined the anti-AIG posse. “They only care about the next election, just like we only care about the next bonus. Well, none of them cares about the country, none of us cares about the institution,” he said, adding: “They really don’t care, and I really don’t care. And frankly, if a trillion dollars gets lost, fine.”

The AIG retention bonuses have rankled many in the public because the company has received a federal rescue package of about $180 billion in loans, stock investments and other commitments from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department. Closing down AIG Financial Products’ trading portfolio has been vital to stemming further losses and repaying the public money.

Brad at Sadly No has some advice for these tone-deaf pompous jerks:

My general reaction: Just quit, you assholes. Try taking around your résumés to other firms if you’re so convinced in your own inflated sense of self-worth. But this is just a guess — when you go in for an interview with another company, having five years’ experience of selling credit default swaps in AIG’s Financial Products division isn’t going to help you get a job. Shit, I wouldn’t hire you to vacuum my rugs or take out my garbage. Because in the end I don’t think that you guys possess any real skills that are useful outside of your own little bubble world.

“The Mc10:35” — McDonald’s Secret Menu Item

Ken AshfordRandom MusingsLeave a Comment

It's got a cult following in San Francisco:

1. Go to McD's right when they are transitioning from breakfast to lunch.

2. Order one of the remaining Egg McMuffins from the breakfast menu and also order a McDouble since the lunch menu is now open.

3. Take the egg and Canadian bacon from the Egg McMuffin and put it on the McDouble.

The guy at the register said people call it a Mc10:35 because that's pretty much the only time you can pull this off.

Mc1035

I'll pass.
 

Oh, Okay, Then. My Oscar Picks

Ken AshfordPopular CultureLeave a Comment

If I am fairly confident, my prediction is in yellow.  Otherwise, if it is a guess, it's in orange.

Will I be live-blogging?  Yes, probably.  I might be starting a little late though, but come and join if you want.

Oscar Winners List 2010

Best Adapted Screenplay

Nick Hornby - 'An Education'
Geoffrey Fletcher - 'Precious'

Best Foreign Language Film

'Ajami' - Israel
'Un Prophète' - France

Best Original Score

'Avatar' - James Horner
'Fantastic Mr. Fox' - Alexandre Desplat
'The Hurt Locker' - Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders
'Sherlock Holmes' - Hans Zimmer
'Up' - Michael Giacchino

Best Original Song

'Almost There' from 'The Princess and the Frog' - Music and Lyric by Randy Newman
'Down in New Orleans' from 'The Princess and the Frog' - Music and Lyric by Randy Newman
'Loin de Paname' from 'Paris 36' – Music by Reinhardt Wagner Lyric by Frank Thomas
'Take It All' from 'Nine' – Music and Lyric by Maury Yeston
'The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)' from 'Crazy Heart' – Music and Lyric by Ryan Bingham and T Bone Burnett

Best Documentary (Short Subject)

Daniel Junge and Henry Ansbacher
Steven Bognar and Julia Reichert
Roger Ross Williams and Elinor Burkett
Bartek Konopka and Anna Wydra

Best Short Film (Live Action)

Juanita Wilson and James Flynn
Patrik Eklund and Mathias Fjellström
Gregg Helvey
Luke Doolan and Drew Bailey
Joachim Back and Tivi Magnusson

Best Short Film (Animated)

Fabrice O. Joubert
Nicky Phelan and Darragh O'Connell
Nicolas Schmerkin

Best Art Direction

Art Direction: Rick Carter and Robert Stromberg; Set Decoration: Kim Sinclair
Art Direction: Dave Warren and Anastasia Masaro; Set Decoration: Caroline Smith
Art Direction: John Myhre; Set Decoration: Gordon Sim
Art Direction: Sarah Greenwood; Set Decoration: Katie Spencer
Art Direction: Patrice Vermette; Set Decoration: Maggie Gray

Best Cinematography

'Avatar' - Mauro Fiore
'The Hurt Locker' - Barry Ackroyd
'Inglourious Basterds' - Robert Richardson
'The White Ribbon' - Christian Berger

Best Costume Design

'Bright Star'  – Janet Patterson
'Coco Before Chanel' - Catherine Leterrier
'Nine' - Colleen Atwood
'The Young Victoria' - Sandy Powell

Best Makeup

'Il Divo' - Aldo Signoretti and Vittorio Sodano
'Star Trek' - Barney Burman, Mindy Hall and Joel Harlow
'The Young Victoria' - Jon Henry Gordon and Jenny Shircore

Best Film Editing

'Avatar' - Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua and James Cameron
'District 9' - Julian Clarke
'The Hurt Locker' - Bob Murawski and Chris Innis
'Inglourious Basterds' - Sally Menke
'Precious' - Joe Klotz

Best Visual Effects

Joe Letteri, Stephen Rosenbaum, Richard Baneham and Andrew R. Jones
Dan Kaufman, Peter Muyzers, Robert Habros and Matt Aitken
Roger Guyett, Russell Earl, Paul Kavanagh and Burt Dalton

Best Sound Editing

Christopher Boyes and Gwendolyn Yates Whittle
Paul N.J. Ottosson
Wylie Stateman
Mark Stoeckinger and Alan Rankin
Michael Silvers and Tom Myers

Best Sound Mixing

Christopher Boyes, Gary Summers, Andy Nelson and Tony Johnson
Paul N.J. Ottosson and Ray Beckett
Michael Minkler, Tony Lamberti and Mark Ulano
Anna Behlmer, Andy Nelson and Peter J. Devlin
Greg P. Russell, Gary Summers and Geoffrey Patterson

Inside The Mind Of The Pentagon Shooter

Ken AshfordCrime1 Comment

His name was  J. Patrick Bedell, if you don't know by now, and he was killed yesterday in a shootout with police at the Pentagon.  What was his beef?  This heavily-hyperlinked post that he wrote, pulled from Wikipedia, provides a clue:

My hope is to use the creativity of markets and advanced technology to transcend the destructive regimes that have fastened themselves upon the world. I have dreamed for an number of years of creating v:production econosystems, which I hope to apply to the creation of v:security service econosystems using new and economic mechanisms and information technology.

I have a bachelor's degree in physics from the University of California, Santa Cruz, and studied biochemistry at San Jose State University. I've studied electrical engineering with the goal of creating microsystems for molecular analysis.[1][2][3][4] You can see a proposal to use aluminum anodization as an adsorption method for DNA molecules on CMOS chips at v:DNA_integrated_circuit/proposal_import_2007 (which originates from an unsuccessful DARPA proposal to create a "microMIRV" interoperable with standard firearms ammunition), and a proposal to use xenon difluoride to create a picoliter-scale computer-controlled device for sorting biomolecules (available at v:Capillary_electrode_array/proposal_import_2007), including DNA and protein molecules. My goals include the discovery of a protein sequence for the diamondase enzyme, enabling the creation of macroscale diamond structures, and the creation of self-assembled macrosystems with CMOS DNA-integrated circuits. The scale of these and other projects have led me to develop financial instruments representing information as a tool to manage large projects that are very knowledge-intensive.

I am determined to see that justice is served in the death of Colonel James Sabow, as a step toward establishing the truth of events such as the September 11 demolitions and institutions such as the coup regime of 1963 that maintains itself in power through the global drug trade, financial corruption, and murder, among other crimes. My work to develop information currency is an effort to create a framework for information management that uses financial markets to create the economic signals (prices) that will effect complex human actions in the real world based on specified information. My desire for justice led me to violate what I think is one of the most unjust laws, cannabis prohibition, by growing 16 cannabis plants on my balcony in Irvine, CA from March 2006 to June 2006. I've posted the Orange County, CA District Attorney's complaint for this offense at http://cannabis.wikia.com/wiki/JPatrickBedell_2006-06-06_cannabis_felony_complaint .

One desired result of my effort is (will be) billions and billions of carefully cultivated, highly valuable cannabis plants growing throughout the United States with complete security of property. I have posted the image to the right in order to illustrate the use of cannabis as a monetary system using digital financial instruments. There are two information currency units in each of the PDF417 codes pictured. One of the information currency units is drawn from a series with "one gram cannabis" with the underlying asset, and the second ICU in each code has as its underlying asset the URL http://www.mises.org/humanaction/pdf/humanaction.pdf and the SHA-1 digest value of the file at that location (fd8205cb8b4793d43b57ba6f6c7367aa700c307a). This is a way of associating the work of Ludwig von Mises with financial value, which may be a tool to implement his ideas in reality. I hope someday to see full-reserve banking and observance of Article One, Section 10 of the US Constitution.

I apologize for the graphic content of some of my contributions, but detailed evidence is sometimes necessary to address important matters. I am very disturbed by the fact that Col. Sabow's civilian superiors and their successors have been able to continue their narco-mercantilism. For historical comparison, I might resemble the odd German still complaining about the murders of the Night of the Long Knives in 1938(?). Of course, Wikipedia didn't exist in 1938!

I am looking for collaborators for ongoing commercial and intellectual efforts. Email to jpbedell at mises.com is welcome!

Here is the full transcript of an audio manifesto. Again, this is from December 2006, during the presidency of George W. Bush:

Hello, and thank you for listening.

Justice is a universal desire of conscious individuals. In modern society, critically important organizations work to ensure that justice is established and preserved. Those individuals who work to uphold justice deserve our thanks, our gratitude, and our support. My purpose in this message is to support those who work for justice by addressing matters that any individual within our existing institutions of justice would find difficult or impossible to address.

The most basic principle of economic justice is the protection of private property and the protection of the right to freely exchange that property. Modern governments, however, consistently and routinely violate the rights of property owners with the assumption – the incorrect assumption – that government can utilize property more efficiently than its lawful owners can.

As institutionalized theft by property violation becomes increasingly routine and accepted, it has far-reaching consequences for the character and morality of society as a whole. The injustice of that permeates society and creates disrespect for the law. On the part of ruling elites, the perception is created that society is to be exploited for the benefit of the rulers. Incentives are created to generate and promote ignorance throughout society to conceal the injustice of that. As the institutionalized violence of government is used to violate the rights of individuals to keep and trade their own property, the violation of economic justice inevitably results in the undermining of justice in every other part of society.

Although the establishment of justice and order is a key responsibility of the United States government, the sheer size of the United States economy and the enormous wealth that is devoted to government, makes the United States government a tempting prize for any organization or collection of bandits ruthless and clever enough to seize it. A criminal organization able to conduct its activities from within the center of power of the United States government would have powerful advantages over other criminal groups.

Such an organization, having seized control of the United States government, would derive enormous power from the taxes extracted from the wealthiest society in the history of the world. Such an organization would be able to manage present objections to its corruption with lavish promises of future benefits in a form of generalized bribery. Such an organization, which would necessarily have great financial sophistication, would be able to use the credit of the United States government to issue trillions of dollars of debt to fund its corrupt activities and neutralize objections to its illegitimacy and in so doing, burden the responsible citizens among its victims with crushing financial obligations.

Very importantly, this criminal group could use its control of the United States monetary system to print money to advance its own purposes of theft, control and enslavement. Such an organization would be able to protect its shipments of illicit drugs into the United States while using the power of law enforcement organization to imprison their would-be competitors, and would subsequently be able to distribute those illicit drugs and launder the enormous profits in the huge and minutely-regulated financial markets of the United States. This criminal organization would use its powers to convert military, intelligence and law enforcement bureaucracies into instruments for political control and the domination and subjection of society while discrediting, destroying and murdering honest individuals within those services that work to root out corruption and faithfully serve their fellow citizens.

This organization, like so many murderous governments throughout history, would see the sacrifice of thousands of its citizens in an event such as the September 11th attacks, as a small cost in order to perpetuate its barbaric control. This collection of gangsters would find it in their interests to foment conflict and initiate wars throughout the world in order to divert attention from their misconduct and criminality. The true nature of such a regime would find its clearest expression in Satanic violence currently ongoing in Iraq.

Perhaps worst of all, such an organization would usurp and destroy the historical leadership of the United States toward human freedom and would, while constantly and loudly preaching the glory of liberty, work to lead the world into a new dark age of slavery and terror.

This seizure of the United States government by an international criminal conspiracy is a long-established reality. The murder of the United States President in 1963, the associated murders and institutional subversion, and the manipulation of official inquiries and public opinion was effected by individuals within organizational structures that play a central role in the United States government up to the present day. The coup regime founded with the murder of President John Kennedy utilizes a number of mechanisms to perpetuate its criminal rule.

The most important of these mechanisms is government control of the economy. Government’s enormous tax revenues and even larger government spending give to the coup regime the means and motivation to sustain its rule. The constantly expanding regulation of business makes it possible for the coup regime to further impose its will on private economic activity and conditions the people under its rule to accept whatever totalitarian measures the regime deems necessary. The policies and actions of the coup regime are constantly masked by official deception, as well as the subversion of the free press through infiltration and secret manipulations.

On a deeper level, however, the deceit that the coup regime utilizes to justify its policies is intimately linked with the deceit that is inherent in policies that seize the property of individuals for the benefit of the politically powerful. The most subtle and dangerous of these policies, and therefore most similar rule of the coup regime itself, is the imposition of a paper monetary system throughout the United States. This far-reaching violation of property rights undermines the security of property in a way that works to the benefit of the politically powerful individuals that control the monetary system.

The political and military disasters such as the wars in Vietnam and Iraq that an illegitimate coup regime uses against the people who pay its bills are closely tied to the effects of inflationary paper monetary systems which are themselves intimately linked with financial and political disasters throughout history. The blatant violations of the constitution of limitations on the economic role of the government accomplished through many subtle usurpations over many decades are perhaps even more pernicious than, and are certainly a key motivation for, the violent seizure of the United States government.

In order to establish a firm and lasting basis for justice and sound government, the economic role of the government must be re-examined in every detail. It must be recognized that arguments for government control of the economy and government redistribution of economic resources are generally misguided … or even shameless lies to advance enslavement and conceal theft and murder. Furthermore, it must, once again, be recognized that the most successful means to ensure justice, secure domestic tranquility, and promote prosperity is to ensure the protection of private property.

Thank you for listening.

Loooooooon.

What Is “Rape”, And What Isn’t?

Ken AshfordCrime, Women's IssuesLeave a Comment

Apparently, some men still need training on this relatively simple matter. 

Let's compare two similar scenarios.

In the first, Stacy is a college freshman.  She goes to a fraternity party and meets Derek, a sophomore at the same college.  The pair hit it off.  It's a college party, and alcohol is consumed.  Stacy, impaired by alcohol, and Derek, who has also been drinking, find an empty dorm room.  Stacy flirtatiously takes off her clothes — the two have sex.  The next morning, Stacy wakes up and regrets what has happened.

The second scenario is exactly the same, EXCEPT Derek initiates the sex, and Stacy, coming in and out of consciousness, is simply too drunk to resist.

Surprising, an astonishing number of college males don't see much difference between the two.  BOTH scenarios, in their mind, are not rape.

How do we know?  This NPR story today tells us:

There's a common assumption about men who commit sexual assault on a college campus: That they made a one-time, bad decision. But psychologist David Lisak says this assumption is wrong —-and dangerously so.

Lisak started with a simple observation. Most of what we know about men who commit rape comes from studying the ones who are in prison. But most rapes are never reported or prosecuted. So Lisak, at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, set out to find and interview men he calls "undetected rapists." Those are men who've committed sexual assault, but have never been charged or convicted.

He found them by, over a 20-year period, asking some 2,000 men in college questions like this: "Have you ever had sexual intercourse with someone, even though they did not want to, because they were too intoxicated [on alcohol or drugs] to resist your sexual advances?"

Or: "Have you ever had sexual intercourse with an adult when they didn't want to because you used physical force [twisting their arm, holding them down, etc.] if they didn't cooperate?"

About 1 in 16 men answered "yes" to these or similar questions.

***

It might seem like it would be hard for a researcher to get these men to admit to something that fits the definition of rape. But Lisak says it's not. "They are very forthcoming," he says. "In fact, they are eager to talk about their experiences. They're quite narcissistic as a group — the offenders — and they view this as an opportunity, essentially, to brag."

What Lisak found was that students who commit rape on a college campus are pretty much like those rapists in prison. In both groups, many are serial rapists. On college campuses, repeat predators account for 9 out of every 10 rapes.

And these offenders on campuses — just like men in prison for rape — look for the most vulnerable women. Lisak says that on a college campus, the women most likely to be sexually assaulted are freshmen.

"It's quite well-known amongst college administrators that first-year students, freshman women, are particularly at risk for sexual assault," Lisak says. "The predators on campus know that women who are new to campus, they are younger, they're less experienced. They probably have less experience with alcohol, they want to be accepted. They will probably take more risks because they want to be accepted. So for all these reasons, the predators will look particularly for those women."

Still, Lisak says these men don't think of themselves as rapists. Usually they know the other student. And they don't use guns or knives.

"The basic weapon is alcohol," the psychologist says. "If you can get a victim intoxicated to the point where she's coming in and out of consciousness, or she's unconscious — and that is a very, very common scenario — then why would you need a weapon? Why would you need a knife or a gun?"

Sex without consent is rape, period.  It doesn't matter if it was forced by a knife or a gun.  Alcohol, too, is a weaon for committing rape.  And as the above story shows, even the perpetrators themselves don't belief that unforced rape is "rape", which is probably why they are repeat offenders.

What's really scary is that the myth goes beyond the rape perpetrators themselves:

At Texas A&M, Elton Yarbrough was a promising student. Then he was linked to five rapes.

The first woman went to the student health center. She says that as staffers did a rape examination, one asked, "Well, were you drunk?" The woman felt she was being blamed. Because of that — and because she'd considered herself a friend of Yarbrough's — she didn't report the assault to campus police.

Here we have a rape examiner insinuating that victim bore some blame with the old chestnut: "Well, you were drunk". 

Happily, the subject of this part of the story, Elton Yarborough, was convicted of rape, but it wasn't until the fifth victim came forward that the campus authorities realized they had a problem.  But on college campsuses, this isn't always the case.  (Another story here)

To me, the "rule" is pretty bright-line.  If the woman does not give her consent, either because she says "no" or because she is too impaired to say anything, it's rape.  Not a very hard rule to understand, or to follow.  Why can't universities make this clear to their students?  And why can't they strictly enforce this rule?

GO SEE A MEMORY, A MONOLOGUE, A RANT & A PRAYER

Tickets: $10
Tickets can be purchased at the door or you can make reservations by calling the number below. Cash or check only please.

Info Phone: (336) 687-1319

Times:
Performances are March 12, 25, 27 @ 8p
Open Space Cafe Theatre
4609 West Market Street Greensboro, NC 27407