Friedman’s Must-Read

Ken AshfordObama OppositionLeave a Comment

NYT columnist Thomas Friedman recalls not too long ago when Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin was accused by his political opponents of being a socialist, a Nazi, a treasonous villian, etc.  That all pretty much ended when Rabin was assassinated in 1995.

Friedman today writes that what we're seeing in America now is much the same thing:

Others have already remarked on this analogy, but I want to add my voice because the parallels to Israel then and America today turn my stomach: I have no problem with any of the substantive criticism of President Obama from the right or left. But something very dangerous is happening. Criticism from the far right has begun tipping over into delegitimation and creating the same kind of climate here that existed in Israel on the eve of the Rabin assassination.

What kind of madness is it that someone would create a poll on Facebook asking respondents, “Should Obama be killed?” The choices were: “No, Maybe, Yes, and Yes if he cuts my health care.” The Secret Service is now investigating. I hope they put the jerk in jail and throw away the key because this is exactly what was being done to Rabin.

Even if you are not worried that someone might draw from these vitriolic attacks a license to try to hurt the president, you have to be worried about what is happening to American politics more broadly.

Our leaders, even the president, can no longer utter the word “we” with a straight face. There is no more “we” in American politics at a time when “we” have these huge problems — the deficit, the recession, health care, climate change and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — that “we” can only manage, let alone fix, if there is a collective “we” at work.

Sometimes I wonder whether George H.W. Bush, president “41,” will be remembered as our last “legitimate” president. The right impeached Bill Clinton and hounded him from Day 1 with the bogus Whitewater “scandal.” George W. Bush was elected under a cloud because of the Florida voting mess, and his critics on the left never let him forget it.

And Mr. Obama is now having his legitimacy attacked by a concerted campaign from the right fringe. They are using everything from smears that he is a closet “socialist” to calling him a “liar” in the middle of a joint session of Congress to fabricating doubts about his birth in America and whether he is even a citizen. And these attacks are not just coming from the fringe. Now they come from Lou Dobbs on CNN and from members of the House of Representatives.

Again, hack away at the man’s policies and even his character all you want. I know politics is a tough business. But if we destroy the legitimacy of another president to lead or to pull the country together for what most Americans want most right now — nation-building at home — we are in serious trouble. We can’t go 24 years without a legitimate president — not without being swamped by the problems that we will end up postponing because we can’t address them rationally.

The American political system was, as the saying goes, “designed by geniuses so it could be run by idiots.” But a cocktail of political and technological trends have converged in the last decade that are making it possible for the idiots of all political stripes to overwhelm and paralyze the genius of our system.

Those factors are: the wild excess of money in politics; the gerrymandering of political districts, making them permanently Republican or Democratic and erasing the political middle; a 24/7 cable news cycle that makes all politics a daily battle of tactics that overwhelm strategic thinking; and a blogosphere that at its best enriches our debates, adding new checks on the establishment, and at its worst coarsens our debates to a whole new level, giving a new power to anonymous slanderers to send lies around the world.

As if to prove Friedman's point, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele responded to Friedman's editorial by calling Friedman "a nut job".

Also proving Friedman's point, an op-ed in Newsmax appeared yesterday endorsing a potential military coup as the only way to solve the "Obama problem".  Newsmax appears to have taken down its article, but here's the full text of the article as it originally appeared.

The article not only endorsed the idea but seemed to suggest that top military brass were also planning or actively considering such an option.  That, however, is dubious.  In his Washington Post column, former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson acknowledges that “military leaders seem impressed” with President Obama’s decision-making process. “Obama’s engaged, deliberate style has fans in the military,” he writes.

My Take On Roman Polanski

Ken AshfordCrime, Popular Culture, Sex ScandalsLeave a Comment

Yes, the 13 year old victim, now in her 40's, has long since forgiven him.

Yes, the victim's mother at the time was apparently some freaked out fame wannabe, and put her daughter in that position.

Yes, it was a long time ago.

Yes, he's famous.

But here's the thing.  A crime is a crime.  He committed a crime.  He pled gulity to it, before he fled.  That's all that matters.  And crimes, by the way, are crimes against the state (that's why criminal cases are typical title "The People versus Joe Smith"), so it doesn't matter what the victim says now.

And it doesn't matter how long ago it happened (no statute of limitations once you've pled guilty).

And it certainly doesn't matter that he makes movies.

Poll Results: 15,000 Women Rank Lovers By Nationality

Ken AshfordSex/Morality/Family Values1 Comment

Telegraph:

WORLD'S WORST LOVERS:

1. Germany (too smelly)
2. England (too lazy)
3. Sweden (too quick)
4. Holland (too dominating)
5. America (too rough)
6. Greece (too lovey-dovey)
7. Wales (too selfish)
8. Scotland (too loud)
9. Turkey (too sweaty)
10. Russia (too hairy)

WORLD'S BEST LOVERS

1. Spain
2. Brazil
3. Italy
4. France
5. Ireland
6. South Africa
7. Australia
8. New Zealand
9. Denmark
10. Canada

One wonders about these women who apparently have slept around enough to be able to make these comparisons in the first place.

Red Sox In Postseason

Ken AshfordRed Sox & Other SportsLeave a Comment

Losing five in a row will get you a wild card spot only because Texas lost three in a row.

Not awe-inspiring, but I'll take it.

Still, they will have to get their mojo on as they face Anaheim post season.  No slouching across the finish line against guys like that.

Lots O’ Sex at my Alma Mater

Ken AshfordSex/Morality/Family Values1 Comment

I graduated from Tufts University, as did my sister and brother-in-law.  And my nephew attends it now.

So this caught my eye:

Tufts University, just outside Boston, has issued a new policy for the 2009-2010 school year regarding sexual activity in dorms.

Here's the key update in the revised campus handbook:

You may not engage in sexual activity while your roommate is present in the room.

Any sexual activity within your assigned room should not ever deprive your roommate(s) of privacy, study, or sleep time.

The Boston Herald says the changes came in response to student gripes about "rambunctious roomies and their raunchy romps."

I suspect this is a problem at all universities, not just Tufts.

God, I hope so.

Who’s Afraid of the Public Option?

Ken AshfordHealth CareLeave a Comment

The Senate Finance Committee is debating whether a public option amendment should be added to their bill.  As expected, Republicans and Blue Dog Dems are opposed.

But, listening to their debate here in the background all day, their arguments against the public option are all the same: government-imposed rationing, long wait times, bureaucrats making treatment decisions, etc.

In other words, it's a bad program that doesn't work (they claim).

What doesn't get said, and what needs desparately to be said, is that the public option is designed to compete with private insurance.  And people can choose the public option (if they want) or stay with their private insurance.

So… even IF the public option turns out to be the terrible nightmare that Republicans claim, what's the downside?  If it's going to be that bad, then people simply won't choose it, right?  So, private insurance companies "win"; it won't cost much to run, etc.

And yet, some Republicans claim that the public options is just a stepping stone to a single payer system, where there are no private insurance companies.  Well, how will that work, if the public option will be so terrible?

You see, it's a shell game.  The truth is that Republicans fear the public option, not because it won't work, but because they fear it will work.  They fear, and rightly so, that on a level-playing feel, insurance companies will fare badly, and (at worst) have to adjust their business practices to be more consumer-friendly. 

UPDATE: Senate Finance Committee votes 15-8 against Rockefeller amendment on public option.

But there's still the public option amendment offered by Sen. Chuck Schumer.  That's up now…

UPDATE:… which loses 13-10.

Has-Been Kirk Cameron’s Latest Hijinx

Ken AshfordEducation, Godstuff1 Comment

The former Growing Pains star, who has gone full-blown creationist now that the plum roles are no longer coming his way, has teamed up with other anti-evolutionists in what he imagines to be a clever ploy to teach people about how bad evolutionary science is:

The ‘Growing Pains’ alum released a video last week announcing that on Nov. 19, he and other Creationist activists will distribute a special ‘Species’ [Darwin’s Origin of Species] with a 50-page intro that slams evolution and paints Darwin as both racist and misogynistic and explicitly highlights “Adolph Hitler’s undeniable connection to the theory.”

Man, Hitler hasn’t had this much airplay since the days of Hitler.  Seriously, can we STOP it with the Hitler already?!?  (By the way, Obama is in Denmark today pushing for the Olympics to come to Chicago.  And you know who else hosted the Olympics?  Hitler!!!)

But Kirk’s logic is laughably fallacious.  I’m not saying Darwin was/wasn’t racist and misogynistic — I honestly have no idea — but assuming he was, what does that mean?  It means nothing.  If the Grandwizard of the KKK said that “2+2=4”, he’s still correct, isn’t he, regardless of his racist views?  Or do we reject math?

And sure.  Hitler believed in a “superior race” which was rather loosely based on “survival of the fittest” — a concept coined and popularized by Darwin.  But Hitler’s “undeniable connection” to evolution means that evolution is… what, exactly?  It only means that he bastardized and corrupted the work of Darwin, at worst.

By the way, Kirk, what about Hitler’s “connection” to Christianity?  From Mein Kampf, here’s what Hitler said about the Jewish person:

“His life is only of this world, and his spirit is inwardly as alien to true Christianity as his nature two thousand years previous was to the great founder of the new doctrine… Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.”

So maybe other people should go around on November 19 passing around Bibles on college campuses, complete with a 50-page introduction discussing the apostles’ support of slavery and Hitler’s undeniable connection to Christianity.

Right, Kirk?

UPDATE:  Love this…

Document Dump

Ken AshfordRaceLeave a Comment

Remember a few months ago when a bunch of black kids from a day camp tried to go swimming in a community pool (permission having been granted by the pool's Board of Driectors), and were then told to leave because some of the pool members (all white) complained?

The Human Relations Committee came out with a damning report this past week.  You can read it here (PDF), but the bottom line is this:

The commission ordered the club to pay a $50,000 civil penalty for the club's discrimation again one child, whose parents filed the complaint with the commission.

The report also orders Valley Club to pay other damages, including reimbursing the parent who filed the complaint for all related expenses. If there is no settlement made between the parent, the club and the commission, either party can request a public hearing before the commission and can after that be challenged in court.

The $50,000 civil penalty is to be paid to state government, under terms of the finding.

Palin Memoir Due In November; English Translation To Follow

Ken AshfordElection 2012Leave a Comment

HuffPo:

NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report) – A memoir by former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin will be published this November, with an English translation due shortly thereafter, her publisher confirmed today.

According to Carol Foyler, a spokesperson for the publisher, translators are working "around the clock" to translate Ms. Palin's text into English.

"We have hired the best linguists in the country, but this is still hard work," Ms. Foyler acknowledged. "It must have been easier to crack the Enigma code in World War II."

Ms. Foyler said that the publishing company was "delighted" with Ms. Palin's manuscript and "deeply relieved that she didn't quit in the middle of it."

400 pages.  In four months. 

And no, Sarah didn't write it.  It's no secret that the actual author is someone named Lynn Vincent who co-wrote Donkey Cons: Sex, Crime, and Corruption in the Democratic Party.

Other reactions, compiled by The New Yorker:

“Many in the mainstream media will also be eager to see how the Republican hockey mom praises them for their objective portrayals of her—and, indeed, her entire family—all last fall.”—L.A. Times Top of the Ticket

“Harper … has moved the release date up from the spring to November 17. That gives Palin followers just less than two months to learn how to read.”—Faded Youth

“I’ve come to learn that if Palin is involved in anything in any way, shape, or form, then the chance of batshit insane things happening increases exponentially. Even if it’s her dictating her “life story” to a ghostwriter. She is like the King Midas of batshit crazy.”—Balloon Juice

“The world will discover the true Sarah Palin and the truth to which we have not heretofore had access. She will give the public her own unfiltered message—untainted by the likes of the agenda-ridden mainstream media. You might want to get in line now.”—Sarah's Web Brigade

“The book was slated for the spring, but was finished so why not get it out in time for holiday sales?”—Elect-SarahPalin.com

“She needs the money sooner because her handler, Meg Stapleton, screwed up the negotiations for last week’s Hong Kong speaking debut by inadvertently agreeing that Palin would be compensated in Chinese Renminbis rather than U.S. Dollars.”—Lynnrockets

“Sarah Palin finishes memoir, a 400 page pop-up book. Comes with free Crayons, Palin-English dictionary, aspirin.”—Muck Rack

“In lieu of sanctions, copies of former US Vice President hopeful Sarah Palin's memoir 'Going Rogue' will be air dropped over the entire country of Iran. The US State Department commented, "If we cannot starve them, we will bore them to death.”—Trans Talk

“I guess ‘Goin’ All Mavericky’ was taken?”—Beach Peanuts

“Normally I don’t like political books with a lot of photos, but this is an exception. There’s nothing I like more than a girl with a plan … especially when that girl is Sarah Palin.”—Be John Gault

“Remember how I have been warning that she was going to be free to roll around the country like a loose cannon? Well, that time has come upon us, just in time for the 2010 campaign stumping.”—God's Own Party?

Supreme Court Cases I’m Following: At A Glance

Ken AshfordGun Control, Supreme CourtLeave a Comment

Case Summary Where did the case come from?  Government position My position My prediction for outcome
9/9/2009 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Whether to overrule precedents upholding state and federal limits on corporate political spending. D.C. Circuit No No Yes
10/6/2009 U.S. v. Stevens Can the government criminalize selling dogfight videotapes or other depictions of animal cruelty? 3rd Circuit Yes No No
10/7/2009 Salazar v. Buono Can an individual challenge a cross on property the government transferred to a private organization? 9th Circuit No No No
11/2/2009 Jones v. Harris Associates Can an investor challenge a mutual-fund adviser for charging excessive fees? 7th Circuit Yes Yes No
11/3/2009 Hemi Group LLC v. City of New York Can a city use civil RICO lawsuit to collect cigarette taxes? 2nd Circuit N/A No No
11/4/2009 Pottawattamie County, IA v. McGhee May a prosecutor be sued for allegedly using false testimony to win a conviction? 8th Circuit No Yes Yes
11/9/2009 Graham v. Florida Can a juvenile offender be sentenced to life without parole for a non-homicide crime? Florida Supreme Court N/A No No
11/9/2009 Bilski v. Kappos Must a business method patent be tied to a particular machine or apparatus,” or transform something "into a different state or thing," to be valid? Federal Circuit Yes Yes Yes
12/2/2009 Stop the Beach Renourishment Inc. v. Florida Does a state program to replenish eroded beaches for public use unconstitutionally deprive coastal property owners of their private ocean access? Florida Supreme Court N/A No No
Not yet scheduled U.S. v. Comstock Do federal prisons have the authority to hold "sexually dangerous" inmates past their sentences out of fear they will violate state law? 4th Circuit Yes No No
Not yet scheduled American Needle Inc. v. NFL Extent of NFL monopoly over individual team logos 7th Circuit Not yet filed

Teams, not NFL, control team logos Teams, not NFL, control team logos
Not yet scheduled Florida v. Powell Does merely telling the accused that he can "talk to attorney" meet the Miranda rights requirement? Florida Supreme Court N/A No No

NEXT DAY UPDATE:  Add one more — a biggie — to the list:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Supreme Court will decide whether the constitutional right of individuals to own firearms trumps state and local laws, reviving the legal battle over gun rights in America.

The high court said Wednesday it agreed to decide the reach of its landmark ruling last year that the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guaranteed an individual right to own guns and use them for lawful purposes like self-defense in the home.

Gun rights cases have been among the country's most divisive social, political and legal issues. The Supreme Court split, in a 5-4 vote, between the conservative and liberal factions, in the 2008 ruling.

The court last year prohibited the federal government from imposing certain restrictions, but it left unclear whether the right also applied to state and local gun control laws.

The Supreme Court said in a brief order it would settle that question by ruling in a dispute over a strict gun control law in Chicago.

Not The Strongest Defense

Ken AshfordGodstuff, Sex/Morality/Family ValuesLeave a Comment

The Vatican addresses the whole clergy-pedophilia thing:

The statement, read out by Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, the Vatican's permanent observer to the UN, defended its record by claiming that "available research" showed that only 1.5%-5% of Catholic clergy were involved in child sex abuse.

Oh… "only 1.5% to 5%"?  Is that all?

Imagine that pedophile statistic being applied to, say, public school teachers.

P.S.  The Vatican would also like you to note that the Protestant and Jewish faiths have their fair share of pedophilia problems, thankyouverymuch.

So noted.

Loon River

Ken AshfordObama OppositionLeave a Comment

Count in singer and still-not-dead Andy Williams as a teabagger:

"Don't like him at all," he said, "I think he wants to create a socialist country. The people he associates with are very Left-wing. One is registered as a Communist.

"Obama is following Marxist theory. He's taken over the banks and the car industry. He wants the country to fail."

It's okay to cut Andy some slack.  he's got to be close to senility by now.