Profile Of The Killer

Ken AshfordCrime, Women's IssuesLeave a Comment

They've caught the guy who shot and killed Dr. Tiller. According to KWCH-TV:

Deputy Chief Tom Stolz w/ Wichita Police Dept. says Dr. Tiller died of a single gunshot wound. The Associated Press says the man detained in the Kansas City area is 51-year-old Scott Roeder of Merriam, Kansas, according to Law Enforcement authorities in the area. Roeder has not been formally charged with the killing at this time. Police say he was arrested without incident after a traffic stop.

Now, before reading further, take a guess at the personality of this guy.  See if this isn't predictable.  Via diarist FreeStateDemMilitia Watchdog previously reported of Roeder:


July 7, [1997], Kansas: Scott Roeder is sentenced to sixteen months in state prison for parole violations following a 1996 conviction for having bomb components in his car trunk. Roeder, a sovereign citizen and tax protester, violated his parole by not filing tax returns or providing his social security number to his employer.

He was also an active member of Operation Rescue; in 2007 a "Scott Roeder" posted this on the Operation Rescue website (which has been down throughout the day, probably more as a result of increased traffic than any sense of collective shame):


[May 19th, 2007 at 4:34 pm] Bleass everyone for attending and praying in May to bring justice to Tiller and the closing of his death camp. Sometime soon, would it be feasible to organize as many people as possible to attend Tillers church (inside, not just outside) to have much more of a presence and possibly ask questions of the Pastor, Deacons, Elders and members while there? Doesn’t seem like it would hurt anything but bring more attention to Tiller.

The Lawrence Journal-World and News relays that Kansas City station KMBC reported a post-it note with a phone number for Operation Rescue in his car at the time of his arrest.

He was a bombmaker, tax protester, member of the "sovereignity" movement, anti-abortion zealot and Operation Rescue member: the arrested suspect manages to fit every stereotype of right-wing militia teabagger.

Surprised?

Right Response, Wrong Response

Ken AshfordCrime, Women's IssuesLeave a Comment

National Right To Life Committee:

WASHINGTON – The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the nation's largest pro-life group, today condemned the killing of Dr. George Tiller.  The following statement may be attributed to NRLC Executive Director, David N. O'Steen, Ph.D.:
 
National Right to Life extends its sympathies to Dr. Tiller's family over this loss of life.
 
Further, the National Right to Life Committee unequivocally condemns any such acts of violence regardless of motivation.  The pro-life movement works to protect the right to life and increase respect for human life.  The unlawful use of violence is directly contrary to that goal.
 
The National Right to Life Committee has always been involved in peaceful, legal activities to protect human lives threatened by abortion, infanticide and euthanasia.  We always have and will continue to oppose any form of violence to fight the violence of abortion.  NRLC has had a policy of forbidding violence or illegal activity by its staff, directors, officers, affiliated state organizations and chapters.  NRLC's sole purpose is to protect innocent human life.
 
NRLC will continue to work through educational and legislative activities to ensure the right to life for unborn children, people with disabilities and older people.  NRLC will continue to work for peaceful solutions to aid pregnant women and their unborn children. These solutions involve helping women and their children and do not involve violence against anyone.

Operation Rescue:

Randall Terry, founder of Operation Rescue, led protests against George Tiller's late-term abortion clinic in Wichita in 1991.

Randall Terry, founder of Operation Rescue states, "George Tiller was a mass-murderer. We grieve for him that he did not have time to properly prepare his soul to face God. I am more concerned that the Obama Administration will use Tiller's killing to intimidate pro-lifers into surrendering our most effective rhetoric and actions. Abortion is still murder. And we still must call abortion by its proper name; murder.

"Those men and women who slaughter the unborn are murderers according to the Law of God. We must continue to expose them in our communities and peacefully protest them at their offices and homes, and yes, even their churches."


This Is Terrorism

Ken AshfordCrime, Women's IssuesLeave a Comment

Ann Friedman:

Dr. George Tiller, an outspoken advocate for abortion rights and one of the few late-term abortion providers in the country, was shot dead in church this morning.
Cara Kulwicki writes at Feministe:

This is the first time an abortion provider has been murdered in over a decade. I have friends who work in abortion clinics. This is terrorism. And right now, I just don't have the words.

The loss of Dr. Tiller is deeply upsetting, and Cara rightly identifies this as a terrorist act. It is the culmination of an ongoing campaign of intimidation and harassment against someone who was providing completely legal health-care services. I've been paying attention to the more militant strains of the anti-choice movement, so this news shouldn't have shocked me as much as it did. But, like Cara, I have friends who work and volunteer in abortion clinics. When violence against abortion providers was hitting a fever pitch 10 years ago, I was not strongly pro-choice identified. I remember reading about the murder of an abortion provider, but it certainly did not affect me the way this news has. Whether it's rational or not, today I'm afraid for everyone who works in a reproductive health clinic. And not only those who provide abortion.


I am also worried about what Tiller's murder means for women in Kansas and elsewhere in the country who need the services that he provided. The simple fact is there are almost no doctors who provide late-term abortions, especially in rural parts of the country. I was in Nebraska several years ago to interview Dr. Leroy Carhart (whose challenges to abortion-restricting laws went all the way to the Supreme Court), and Carhart and Tiller were the only two late-term providers in their region. If one wanted to go on vacation or got sick, the other had to fill in. There was no one else. Perhaps it would be a fitting memorial to Dr. Tiller to contribute to Medical Students for Choice, and encourage more doctors with a deep commitment to reproductive rights to become abortion providers.

Publius has some thoughts:

This violent act also bears quite directly on the whole "empathy" debate.  What's interesting about Obama's comments is that the empathy argument doubles as both a populist argument and a high-level theoretical assault on conservative jurisprudence. 

One tenet of both originalism and textualism is that consequences of constitutional interpretation should be irrelevant.  If you take both theories seriously, then you can't really allow consequences to affect your reasoning.  What matters — the only thing that matters — is what the text says, or what the text was originally understood to mean.  And for now, let's assume that conservatives take these theories seriously (rather than merely using them as window-dressing for political preferences).

The Kansas terrorism illustrates why it's important to look at the real world when interpreting the constitution.  For instance, there's a First Amendment dispute about whether and to what extent the government can limit abortion protests outside of clinics. 

The argument for aggressive protection (and thus a relaxing of First Amendment scrutiny) is that abortion protests have proven to be historically dangerous.  Doctors and staffers and patients face truly dangerous risks — risks that were tragically reaffirmed today.  The law should recognize these concrete dangers and not pretend like these protests come straight out of a Norman Rockwell painting of a townhall meeting.  It's fun to argue about free speech in the abstract — but we don't really have that luxury.

The real world matters.  It should be relevant.  It's somewhat amazing to have to argue this.  But that's where we are.

RIP Milvina Dean

Ken AshfordHistoryLeave a Comment

98 years ago today, the Titanic was launched.

And we know what happened a couple of weeks later.

706 passengers survived.  And the last survivor of the Titanic died this morning.  She was 97.  Milvina Dean was just over two months at the time of the sinking.  She was in lifeboat 13.

She was in the news a few months ago when she had to auction of her Titanic memorabilia in order to pay nursing home costs.

But Leo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet stepped in paid her nursing home fees….

Ugly America

Ken AshfordBreaking News, Crime, Women's Issues1 Comment

By now, you may have heard about the killing of Dr. George Tiller in Wichita, Kansas this morning.  It took place in (of all places) a church.

Dr. George Tiller has long been a target (literally and figuratively) of the religious right, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, and others because he performs late term abortions.  As Amanda Marcotte wrote:

[Tiller] is one of the two doctors in the country that specializes in the very small percentage of abortions performed late in pregnancy (but before viability) done for health reasons, usually because the pregnancy is a danger to a woman's health or life, or because the fetus is dead or dying…. He's been shot in both arms, stalked by the attorney general's office under Phill Kline … and charged with the crime of performing a bunch of illegal abortions, for which he was acquitted.


This is perhaps something that needs to be emphasized: he performed abortions for women who wanted to have babies but couldn't.

While many abortion opponents are quick to condemn the killing (see, e.g., the Christian News Wire), the rank-and-file are, well, quite rank:

The comments on Free Republic are typically nauseating and vile as well.

This is a divided country on many issues.  But I don't see anyone on the left killing anyone on the right.  And if one did, there wouldn't be smatterings of applause.

In any event, if one is anti-abortion, I fail to see how this moves the ball forward.  More likely, the opposite.

As for the killer, who some will no doubt call a hero, all we know right now is this:

Wichita television station KAKE-TV reported that police were looking for a blue Ford Taurus with a K-State vanity plate, license number 225 BAB. Police described him as a white male in his 50s or 60s, 6 feet 1 inch tall, 220 pounds, wearing a white shirt and dark pants.

Latest Update:

KWCH Eyewitness News has confirmed the suspect in the shooting of Dr. George Tiller is in custody in the Kansas City area. Wichita police say the man was arrested near Gardner, KS at around 2:00 Sunday afternoon.

This Day In Theatre History

Ken AshfordHistory, TheatreLeave a Comment

250 years ago today:

On this day [May 31] in 1759, lawmakers in Pennsylvania adopt a law forbidding the performance of plays. The law was adopted in response to pressure from religious groups, particularly Baptists, who found theatrical performances immoral. Anyone found guilty of putting on a play was fined 500 pounds.

Fuckin' religious right.

Fatal Attraction: The Original Ending

Ken AshfordYoutubeLeave a Comment

Alex Forrest (Glenn Close) doesn't try to kill Dan Gallagher (Michael Douglas).  No bathtub scene.  In the original version, she exacts her revenge in a different way.

Test audiences hated the original ending (shown below), so the cast was called back together to reshoot the ending as we now know it.

But here's how it originally went.  If you're a fan of the movie, and haven't seen this yet, it's an…. interesting… treat:

Tom Goldstein Reviews Sotomayor’s Decisions

Ken AshfordRace, Supreme CourtLeave a Comment

Over at SCOTUSblog, Tom Goldstein notes all proverbial ink being spilled over Sotomayor's race, along with the implicit and explicit statements that her supposed bias will prevent her from judicating equally and fairly.

So he decided to do something novel:

It seems to me that there is an infinitely simpler and more accurate way of figuring out whether Judge Sotomayor decides cases involving race fairly and dispassionately – read her decisions

Gee, what a concept.

He notes that she has heard over 100 cases dealing with race, covering everything from employment discrimination to bias in jury selection.

After reviewing 50 cases, he offers this interim report:

In those 50 cases, the panel accepted the claim of race discrimination only three times.  In all three cases, the panel was unanimous; in all three, it included a Republican appointee.  In roughly 45, the claim was rejected.  (Two were procedural dispositions.)

On the other hand, she twice was on panels reversing district court decisions agreeing with race-related claims – i.e., reversing a finding of impermissible race-based decisions.  Both were criminal cases involving jury selection.

In the 50 cases, the panel was unanimous in every one.  There was a Republican appointee in 38, and these panels were all obviously unanimous as well.  Thus, in the roughly 45 panel opinions rejecting claims of discrimination, Judge Sotomayor never dissented.

It seems to me that these numbers decisive disprove the claim that she decides cases with any sort of racial bias.

Goldstein will update his findings, with numbers, when he is finished.

Jon & Kate and Child Labor Laws

Ken AshfordCourts/Law, Popular Culture1 Comment

First, a disclosure: I hate reality TV.  And I never even heard of "Jon & Kate Plus 8", the popular TLC reality series, until a week ago. 

Apparently, it is a reality show about Jon and Kate Gosselin, a Pennsylvania husband and wife, as they raise their eight young children, including 8-year-old twins and sextuplets who just turned 5.

An interesting legal question has come up regarding the show (and no, it doesn't have anything to do with their supposed extramarital affairs).  Depending on the outcome, it could spell trouble for reality shows in general.

The Pennsylvania Department of Labor says it's looking into whether the hit show "Jon & Kate Plus 8" is complying with the state's child labor law. TLC said Friday it "fully complies" with state laws and regulations.

***

The Labor Department received a complaint against the show and is "gathering information" from its representatives, department spokesman Justin Fleming told The Associated Press. Fleming would not say when the complaint was filed or who filed it.

The fact a complaint is being investigated doesn't necessarily mean the department believes the show did anything wrong.

"Any complaint we get, we investigate," Fleming said.

Here's the legal issue:

Child actors and other young performers are protected by Pennsylvania labor law, but it's not clear whether the law applies to reality TV. Investigators will have to decide whether the Gosselins' house in southeastern Pennsylvania is essentially a TV set where producers direct much of the action — in which case the law may apply — or a home where the kids aren't really working but are simply living their lives, albeit in front of the cameras.

What are the repercussions?  Forget about child labor — that's important as far as the Gosselin kids are concerned, but there are bigger issues than that.  Specifically, if it looks like, under the eyes of the law, reality shows are deemed to be "directed", with the "stars" being "employees" rather than, say, "subjects of documentaries", that opens up a whole host of legal issues in the areas of labor and employment law, actors unions, and other matters.

Put another way, this investigation has the potential to expose, if only a little bit, so-called "reality" shows for what they often really are: unscripted yet staged dramas with non-actors.  And, I hope, perhaps their popularity might diminish once people realize that what they're watching isn't really "reality".

Ending This Once And For All

Ken AshfordSupreme CourtLeave a Comment

Rich Tucker at Townhall, saying succinctily what many on the right are saying about Sonia Sotomayor:

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life,” she said back then. Oh? She seems to be saying a person’s ethnicity or gender (or both) would make that person better able to read the law than a person of a different ethnicity or gender. That’s a nakedly discriminatory statement.

She "seems to be saying"?  Good God, man.  It's in English, not some code.

And in plain English, what she IS saying is not a blanket statement that all Latinos and/or all women would make a better judge than any white man.  She's talking about wise Latina women who have had experiences (by virtue of being in a double minority) that white males have not had.

And she's not even saying it as a statement of fact.  It's a statement of desire.  The first three words are "I would hope…."

Words have meaning, and only the feverish anti-Obama partisans are drinking the Koolaid regarding this fast-and-loose re-interpretation of what Sotomayor said.  The rest of us understand.

In Honor Of Sonia Sotomayor

Ken AshfordSupreme CourtLeave a Comment

Rita Morena and a cast of racists put their bigotry to music…

Meanwhile, a small chorus of conservatives are coming out urging that Republican opposers of Sotomayor show restraint, and get away from the silly "racist" name-calling.  Even the Wall Street Journal is saying, "Republicans, Let's Play Grown-Up", to which John Cole responds:

Does anyone honestly think they can dial back the crazy on this? It seems like it is already out there and way too late. You’ve had Rush, Newt, Tancredo and others calling her a racist for days, you have all the groups that stand to do some serious moneymaking out there screaming radical activist (think Wendy Long and company), and the assorted right-wing magazines like Commentary and NRO and the Weekly Standard have already pretty much staked out a position on the lunatic fringe, and of course the WingNet has followed suit. How do you roll that back?

Can the Wurlitzer play in reverse?

UPDATE:  I guess the call to conservatives to be nice and adult didn't reach this clown:

Yesterday on his radio show, conservative host G. Gordon Liddy continued the right wing's all-out assault on Judge Sonia Sotomayor. […]

"I understand that they found out today that Miss Sotomayor is a member of La Raza, which means in illegal alien, 'the race.' And that should not surprise anyone because she's already on record with a number of racist comments." […]

"Let's hope that the key conferences aren't when she's menstruating or something, or just before she's going to menstruate. That would really be bad. Lord knows what we would get then."

Wow, racist and misogynistic.  These people just can't help but show their ugly nature.

Dear Michael Steele

Ken AshfordRepublicansLeave a Comment

I read your article in Politico.  I see you were trying to strike a theme:

Republicans have engaged in some healthy soul-searching since Election Day, trying to come to grips with our minority status and debating the best way forward….

To accomplish this goal Republicans are turning a corner in three important ways: First, the Republican Party will be forward-looking – it is time to stop looking backward…

Republicans are emerging once again with the energy, the focus, and the determination to turn our timeless principles into new solutions for the future

Okay.  Forward-looking, future-oriented.  Got it.

So I hit a wall when I read this, toward the end of your article:

The Republican Party has turned a corner, and as we move forward Republicans should take a lesson from Ronald Reagan.

Eeeeeeeerp! *CRASH*

Reagan?  Who became president a generation ago?  Reagan?  That's "forward-looking"?

Care to 'splain?

Again, we’re not looking back – if Reagan were here today he would have no patience for Americans who looked backward.

That has to be the most unintentionally funny-in-an-ironic-way statement I've read in ages.  Dude, you're invoking a long-dead, hopeless irrelevant Ronald Reagan to support your thesis of not looking backward!

Fail.

In order to go forward, the Reagan worship has to stop.  A few weeks ago, Jon Chait explained that the conservatives' approach too often consists of "latching onto an old president, glossing over the reality of his record, and trying to recreate all of his actions whether or not they have any bearing upon the circumstances of the present day…. The 'philosophical content' of Reagan-worship is a cult-like process for circumscribing original thought."

Indeed. And it shows no signs of letting up.

Laodicean

Ken AshfordPopular CultureLeave a Comment

…meaning "indifferent or lukewarm especially in matters of religion".

That was the winning word in last night's Scripps 82nd Annual National Spelling Bee:

SpellwinnerThirteen-year-old Kavya Shivashankar of Olathe, Kansas, spelled "laodicean," Thursday night to take top honors in the 82nd annual Scripps National Spelling Bee.

The eighth-grader won $40,000 in cash and prizes for nailing the final word. Pronounced lay-odd-uh-see-an, the word means lukewarm or indifferent, particularly in matters of politics or religion.

This year's bee — an event that has skyrocketed in popularity, thanks to exposure on television and in movies — started on Tuesday in Washington with a record 293 spellers.

The competition went 15 rounds. Spellers ranged from 9 to 15 years old. According to the contest's Web site, 117 of the spellers speak languages other than English, and English was not the first language of 33 of the spellers.

The first National Spelling Bee was in 1925 and featured nine contestants.

In an event that has seen contestants visibly crack under the strain of the national spotlight in past years, Shivashankar — competing in her fourth national finals — appeared composed throughout.

As she spelled words that included "phoresy," "hydrargyrum" and "huisache," she calmly went through the routine of asking each word's pronunciations, origin and roots before ticking them off for the judges.

Her father, who is her spelling coach, would tap his foot in time as she spelled the words and at one point appeared so confident that he waved to someone while his daughter was in the middle of spelling a word.

Second-place finisher Tim Ruiter of Reston, Virginia, bowed out after misspelling "Maecenas," a generous patron of the arts.

Jill Biden, wife of Vice President Joe Biden, was in the audience to watch the finals, which were nationally televised on ABC.

Shivashankar attends California Trail Junior High School. Her hobbies including swimming, cycling and traditional Indian dance, according to the contest's Web site. She plans to become a neurosurgeon.

Downfall Redux

Ken AshfordYoutubeLeave a Comment

One of my favorite internet memes is to take the bunker scene from the film Downfall (a German movie about the last days of Hitler, which was nominated in 2005 for the Academy Award, Best Foreign Language Film) and add "better" subtitles.  It's that simple, but the results are often laugh-out-loud funny.

Here is one entitled "Real Estate Downfall":

In this one, Hitler reacts with displeasure to the new Star Trek movie:

And Hitler reacts badly to Twitter problems:

Okay.  Those last two were kind of geeky.  How about Hitler learning there's no Santa Claus?

And of course, the meme gets meta, as Hitler learns that the subtitles are changed:

There's plenty more if you search Youtube…..