Mind-boggling stupid Nathan Tabor is at it again:

Google the phrase “Muslim violence,” and more than 29 million entries pop up. Granted, some of these citations represent violence committed against Muslims, but, unfortunately, quite a few represent violence committed in the name of Islam.

This makes me wonder: What does Islam really stand for?

Only a fool or an idiot would conclude that Islam is a violent religion based on the number of Google hits.

But let’s put that methodology into practice, shall we?

First, let’s back up Nathan’s "research".  How many hits do we get when we type "Muslim violence" into Google.  Here we go…

Hmmm.  18,900,000 hits.  Not quite the "29 million" that Nathan claimed.  I guess Islam isn’t that violent.

But sadly, we lack a point of reference.  So let’s Google the prhase "Christian violence".  Here we go….

WOW!  36,700,000 hits.  So according to Nathan’s Theory Of Google indicators Of Violence, Christian faith is twice as violent as Muslim faith.

This makes me wonder: What does Christianity really stand for?

In fact, I challenge anyone to read Nathan’s Islam-bashing post substituting the word "Christian" for "Islam".  It holds up pretty well.

So what exactly was your point, Nathan?