What The Durbin Kerfuffle Reveals About The Right Wing

Ken AshfordRepublicansLeave a Comment

Yglesius said it for me:

A little while ago Dick Durbin noted on the Senate floor that torturing prisoners was the sort of thing Nazis or Communists would do, and that the United States, trying to be one of the world’s good guys, should hold itself to a higher standard of conduct. The right-wing noise machine, deploying some now familiar tactics, decided that the correct response would be to deliberately misrepresent what Durbin was saying and express a lot of outrage that someone would fail to understand that contemporary America is not, in fact, just like Nazi Germany.

* * *

It’s interesting as a case study in the operation of the smear machine, but really more telling as an instance of the ethical black hole into which the contemporary right has fallen. Nowadays, every time somebody raises the topic of immoral torture-related policies undertaken by the Bush administration the instant conservative reaction is to transform the conversation into a debate about the appropriateness of the critics’ rhetoric. Every time, the point of the defense is not to defend the conduct in question, but simply to note that someone, somewhere, at some time has done worse things. We’re better than Saddam Hussein! Our prisons aren’t as bad as Auschwitz! People may be detained arbitrarily without hearings, appeal, due process, or POW status, but it’s no Gulag!

***

This, then, is your “intellectual and moral seriousness,” your eternal “truths about human life and dignity”: if it’s better than Hitler, it’s a-okay with them. “The new moralism” . . .  seems to be different from the old moralism in that morality, in the sense of not doing bad things, doesn’t really play a role.

Egregious Is As Egregious Does

Ken AshfordBush & Co., CongressLeave a Comment

"I thought Durbin was totally out of line. I watched some of his comments on the floor of the United States Senate. For him to make those comparisons was one of the more egregious things I’d ever heard uttered on the floor of the United States Senate."

— Vice President Dick Cheney, in an interview with radio host Steve Gill.

"Go fuck yourself."

— Vice President Dick Cheney, on the floor of the United States Senate.

AssHat Gets Stymied – Declares Victory

Ken AshfordRight Wing Punditry/IdiocyLeave a Comment

John, from Powerline, takes a stand:

I called Senator Dick Durbin’s office this morning at (202) 224-2152 and, after being on hold for a while, laid out the reasons why I think Durbin should resign from the Senate.

“Hi.  This is John Hindrocket from Powerline, the Blog of the Century.  You may remember me as the guy who calls Jimmy Carter a ‘traitor’, and thinks that the British Government was too soft on Gandhi and his ‘rabble’ back int the 1940’s.  I’m a very important person, and I am not to be trifled with.  Really.  Anyway, I have something to tell ya…”

His staffer told me that as of this morning, he is standing by his statement comparing American soldiers to the Nazis, the Communists and the Khmer Rouge.

His staffer said that?  Really?

There was one caveat, however: the staffer told me that Durbin never actually said “American soldiers,” and that there are also contract interrogators at Guantanamo Bay.

Okay, then his staffer didn’t say that.  Thanks for clearing up that little lie you said earlier.

I asked whether Durbin was trying to claim that everything bad about Gitmo was the fault of civilians, and the army has nothing to do with it.

“Then I asked whether Durbin was trying to claim that child molesters should be given tax breaks.  Because I figured that since I couldn’t get Durbin in trouble for what he actually said, I would try to pile shit on him for what he was trying to say.”

She backtracked quickly and denied that this was Durbin’s theory—it would, of course, be an absurd claim since the military runs Guantanamo Bay and sets the policies there.

Yes, John, she “backtracked” from a position that (a) Durbin never took and (b) you unsuccessfully tried to attribute to him.  rolleyes

While you’re at it, maybe you can accuse him of rape, and when his staffer denies that, you can claim how she is being “evasive” and “backtracking”.

Her evasion shows, though, how deeply dishonest Durbin’s position is.

Damn her for denying my transparent attempt to spin Durbin’s quote into something reprehensible!”

We’d be interested to hear from others how their calls to Durbin’s office are received.

“Anyone else get outwitted by this low-level staffer?  We’re just wondering…”

Floodgate Still Open

Ken AshfordIraqLeave a Comment

A key Foreign Office diplomat responsible for liaising with UN inspectors says today that claims the government made about Iraq’s weapons programme were “totally implausible”.

He tells the Guardian: “I’d read the intelligence on WMD for four and a half years, and there’s no way that it could sustain the case that the government was presenting. All of my colleagues knew that, too”.

Read it and weep.

White House and White Outs

Ken AshfordBush & Co.Leave a Comment

Think Progress has a nice link-o-riffic list of the many many instances in which the Bush White House has altered or buried expert analysis when the facts didn’t jibe with the adminsitration’s policies.  The full text is below.  Read it, and ask yourself, are we to believe the fixing of facts around policy didn’t happen with respect to Iraq?

Cattle Grazing: “The Bush administration altered critical portions of a scientific analysis of the environmental impact of cattle grazing on public lands before announcing relaxed grazing limits on those lands, according to scientists involved in the study…conclusions that the proposed rules might adversely affect water quality and wildlife, including endangered species, were excised and replaced with language justifying less-stringent regulations favored by cattle ranchers.”

Hog Farming: Nationally respected Agriculture Department microbiologist Dr. Zahn discovered that hog farms were emitting drug-resistant airborne bacteria that “if breathed by humans, would make them harder to treat when ill. Zahn presented his findings at a scientific conference in 2000, but the Bush administration stopped him from publishing his data 11 times between September 2001 and April 2002, he said. When Danish researchers sought to learn more about his work, Zahn wasn’t allowed to share his techniques.”

Climate Change: “A White House official who once led the oil industry’s fight against limits on greenhouse gases has repeatedly edited government climate reports in ways that play down links between such emissions and global warming, according to internal documents…[The] official, Philip A. Cooney, removed or adjusted descriptions of climate research that government scientists and their supervisors, including some senior Bush administration officials, had already approved. In many cases, the changes appeared in the final reports.”

Air Quality at Ground Zero: “In the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the World Trade Center, the White House instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to give the public misleading information, telling New Yorkers it was safe to breathe when reliable information on air quality was not available. That finding is included in a report released Friday by the Office of the Inspector General of the EPA. It noted that some of the agency’s news releases in the weeks after the attack were softened before being released to the public: Reassuring information was added, while cautionary information was deleted.”

Toxicology of Mercury: “The White House and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) made changes to a report from the National Academy of Sciences on the toxicology of mercury, a powerful neurotoxin that is especially dangerous to pregnant women and young children…White House staff made editorial interventions in the report, which was commissioned by Congress to establish the science on the risks associated with mercury. The White House’s alterations downplayed the risks of mercury, replaced specific enumerations of mercury-related harms with bland, general references, and introduced additional emphasis on uncertainty.”

Effectiveness of Condoms: “The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and USAID have removed or revised fact sheets on condoms, excising information about their effectiveness in disease prevention, and promoting abstinence instead.”

Effects of Oil Drilling on the Arctic Refuge: “Interior Secretary Gale Norton substantially altered biological findings from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concerning effects of oil development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge before she transmitted them to Congress, according to documents released October 19 by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.” In one instance, Norton’s defense was that she “simply made an error in her testimony – saying ‘outside’ when she meant to say ‘inside.’”

Abortion: “The removal from a National Cancer Institute website of a scientific analysis concluding that abortions do not increase a woman’s risk of breast cancer. That move, in November 2002, contradicted the broad medical consensus, and members of Congress protested the change. In response, the NCI updated its website to include the conclusion of a panel of experts that induced abortion is not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk.”

HIV/AIDS: “During the latter half of 2002, the Administration began removing scientific information, relating to the spread of HIV, from government websites, including those of the Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health. Much of the information that was removed contracted [sic] claims made by the administration’s abstinence-only agenda.”

Cancer: Earlier this year, “EPA’s guidelines acknowledge[d], for the first time, that children under 2 years of age are 10 times more likely to get cancer from certain chemicals than adults who are similarly exposed. But the White House Office of Management and Budget undermined that acknowledgment by inserting language in the guidelines that make it easy for industry to block EPA from following them when assessing cancer-causing chemicals.”

Stem Cell Research: “[The] Bush administration dismissed Dr. Elizabeth Blackburn, a leading cell biologist, and Dr. William May, a prominent medical ethicist, from the President’s Council on Bioethics…[Blackburn] was removed from the panel soon after she objected to a Council report on stem cell research. In an essay in the April 1, 2004, issue of The New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Blackburn recounted how the dissenting opinion she submitted, which she believes reflects the scientific consensus in America, was not included in the council’s reports even though she had been told the reports would represent the views of all the council’s members.”

Ground-Water: Vice President Dick Cheney’s old company Halliburton “pioneered” an oil-drilling technique that “can contaminate drinking water supplies with carcinogens and is therefore required by law to be regulated by the EPA.” Halliburton has spent years trying to get the federal government to exempt the technique from environmental regulations.” A senior Environmental Protection Agency recently revealed that “the EPA [initially concluded] that the technique can be dangerous to public health, but then [deleted] the conclusion after Cheney’s office demanded it.” Furthermore, six of the seven EPA panel members who decided that the technique was “safe” had all come from the energy industry.

LGF’s Premature Ejaculation

Ken AshfordIraq, Right Wing Punditry/IdiocyLeave a Comment

The Little Green Footballs post:

Is British reporter Michael Smith, who broke the Downing Street memo story (after re-typing and destroying the originals), the same Michael Smith who was hired by Mary Mapes as a CBS assistant producer in the Rathergate scandal?

You can almost hear the ohpleaseGodletitbetrueohohohohpleasebetrue-ohpleaseimgonnacumiswearimgonnacumohpleaseletitbetrue breathlessness behind their words.

Sadly, the answer is no.

Not surprising speculation coming from LGF, especially when anybody with rudimentary google skills can easily find out that Michael Smith is (a) A Brit and (b) worked for the Telegraph last fall instead of CBS.

More On Cheney’s Lies

Ken AshfordIraqLeave a Comment

As everyone knows, Cheney recently said in CNN that the insurgency was in its “last throes”.

Here’s what General William Webster, the U.S. commander for Baghdad, said the other day:

"Certainly saying anything about ‘breaking the back’ or ‘about to reach the end of the line’ or those kinds of things do not apply to the insurgency at this point."

Cheney is a liar.  QED.

What Hagel Said

Ken AshfordIraqLeave a Comment

"Things aren’t getting better, they’re getting worse.”

“The White House is completely disconnected from reality

“It’s like they’re just making it up as they go along. The reality is that we’re losing in Iraq

More and more of my colleagues up here are concerned"

– Republican Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska.

The US Wanted Democracy In Iraq? Um . . . Not So Much

Ken AshfordIraqLeave a Comment

One of the Downing Street Memos, informally called the Options Paper (PDF format) is interesting in that it discusses two apparently equally acceptable post-Iraq outcomes:

The US administration has lost faith in containment and is now considering regime change. The end states could either be a Sunni strongman or a representative government.

The paper goes on to list the plusses and minuses of each course of action, although it never “decides” which option is preferable.

Later on, the Options Paper memo list seven UK objectives for the Iraq war, and noticably absent is any objective pertaining to the democratization of Iraq.

Perhaps Bush and Blair settled on the “democratization” option at a time subsequent to the Options Paper memo.  But seeing as we’re now being told that the installation of a democracy was an integral part of our reasons for invading Iraq, it is interesting to see how little weight it carried in the preparation and run-up to the war.

Please. Let’s Beat Up Michael Schiavo Some MORE!

Ken AshfordAssisited Suicide/Schiavo, RepublicansLeave a Comment

Typical republican trick. Look like a fool for your actions so shift the focus onto something else.

Like many on the right, Jeb Bush has much egg on his face about the whole Schiavo matter.  She was in a persistent vegetative state, she was blind, and had half a brain.  Despite what the right-to-useless-lifers stated, Terri Schiavo was never going to become a Rockette dancing on the stage of Radio City Music Hall, or . . . you know . . . talk.  Never.  Never ever.

A decent person would say, “Hey.  Look, I was wrong.  Maybe I wanted so much to think she was coherent that I just saw what I wanted to see.  I guess, in retrospect, I made the situation worse by meddling.”

Not Jeb Bush.  Apparently, he doesn’t have enough Schiavo egg on his face, so now he’s investigating circumstances that are FIFTEEN YEARS old.  And he is asking questions:

Gov. Jeb Bush asked a prosecutor Friday to investigate why Terri Schiavo collapsed 15 years ago, calling into question how long it took her husband to call 911 after he found her.

In a letter faxed to Pinellas-Pasco County State Attorney Bernie McCabe, Bush said Michael Schiavo testified in a 1992 medical malpractice trial that he found his wife collapsed at 5 a.m., and he said in a 2003 television interview that he found her about 4:30 a.m. He called 911 at 5:40 a.m.

“Between 40 and 70 minutes elapsed before the call was made, and I am aware of no explanation for the delay,” Bush wrote.

Jeb, give it a rest.  Supposedly, you have been aware of this matter for years, seeing as how you’ve stuck your big fat nose into it and commented on it repeatedly.  Only NOW are you realizing something “odd” about Terri’s collapse and the 911 call?  The more you try to salvage some dignity, the more you end up looking like a jackass.

Update:  On Larry King (the 2003 television interview described above), Michael Schiavo :

Climbed into bed. Terri said good night to me. Gave me a kiss. She woke up, said good night, gave me a kiss. I gave her a kiss back. I’d say, about 4:30 in the morning, I was, for some reason, getting out of bed and I heard a thud in the hall. I race out there and Terri was laying in the hall. I went down to get her. I thought, Well, maybe she just tripped or whatever. I rolled her over and she was lifeless. And it almost seems like she had this last breath.

So I held her in my arms, and I’m trying to shake her up. I ran over, I called 911. Her brother happened to live in the same complex as we did. I called him. I went back to Terri. And from there, six, seven minutes later, the paramedics…

Now, he says it was “about 4:30” in the morning—a clear indication that he wasn’t sure of the time when speaking to Larry King.  So, let’s make a couple of reasonable assumptions about why Michael Schiavo wasn’t sure, shall we?:

(1) When Michael Schiavo got out of bed that morning, he didn’t look at the clock.  (I got up last night sometime to pee . . . and I have no idea what time it was.  Has that NEVER happened to you?)

(2) Even if he DID look at the clock, he probably wouldn’t have remembered what the clock said, given the horrifying events that were about to occur.

(3) It is even MORE unlikely that he would remember the time more than a decade later when being interviewed on Larry King.

Conclusion: The so-called “40 to 70 minute” gap that Jeb has a hard-on about can be attributed to one thing: Michael Schiavo simply estimated the time wrong.  To him, the fact of “what time it was” was extremely irrelevant to Michael, considering what else was going on.  What was he supposed to do?  Make a log entry?

OH, BY THE WAY:  Speaking of sitting around and doing nothing while tragedy ensues, maybe Jeb should inquire about this:

Mypetgoat

The Shittiest Job On The Planet

Ken AshfordBush & Co., IraqLeave a Comment

No doubt, it belongs to White House Press Secretary Scotty McClellan.  The poor guy has to get up in front of the press corp and explain (or explain away) the unexplainable deceptions of the Bush Administration.  It can’t be easy.  From E&P, here’s an awkward exchange between Scotty and reporter Terry Moran.  Moran is referring to Cheney’s recent comment on Larry King that the Iraqi insurgency is in its “last throes” (despite the fact that May was the 5th deadliest month for American soldiers in Iraq, and this month is even worse):

Q: Scott, is the insurgency in Iraq in its ‘last throes’?

McCLELLAN: Terry, you have a desperate group of terrorists in Iraq that are doing everything they can to try to derail the transition to democracy. The Iraqi people have made it clear that they want a free and democratic and peaceful future. And that’s why we’re doing everything we can, along with other countries, to support the Iraqi people as they move forward….

Q: But the insurgency is in its last throes?

McCLELLAN: The Vice President talked about that the other day—you have a desperate group of terrorists who recognize how high the stakes are in Iraq. A free Iraq will be a significant blow to their ambitions.

Q: But they’re killing more Americans, they’re killing more Iraqis. That’s the last throes?

McCLELLAN: Innocent—I say innocent civilians. And it doesn’t take a lot of people to cause mass damage when you’re willing to strap a bomb onto yourself, get in a car and go and attack innocent civilians. That’s the kind of people that we’re dealing with. That’s what I say when we’re talking about a determined enemy.

Q: Right. What is the evidence that the insurgency is in its last throes?

McCLELLAN: I think I just explained to you the desperation of terrorists and their tactics.

Q: What’s the evidence on the ground that it’s being extinguished?

McCLELLAN: Terry, we’re making great progress to defeat the terrorist and regime elements. You’re seeing Iraqis now playing more of a role in addressing the security threats that they face. They’re working side by side with our coalition forces. They’re working on their own. There are a lot of special forces in Iraq that are taking the battle to the enemy in Iraq. And so this is a period when they are in a desperate mode.

Q: Well, I’m just wondering what the metric is for measuring the defeat of the insurgency.

McCLELLAN: Well, you can go back and look at the Vice President’s remarks. I think he talked about it.

Q: Yes. Is there any idea how long a ‘last throe’ lasts for?

McCLELLAN: Go ahead, Steve….

That’s a tough argument to sell: they’re killing more of us because they are desparate because they know they are in the “last throes”.  I feel bad for Scotty.

Media Bias

Ken AshfordRace, Right Wing and Inept MediaLeave a Comment

A pregnant mother in California goes missing in 2002, and foul play is suspected.  Months later, her body turns up in a San Francisco harbor.

Laci Peterson?  Wrong.  Her name is Evelyn Hernandez.

A young attractive woman from the South goes missing.

Natalee Holloway?  Nope.  Her name is Tamika Huston.

Never heard of Evelyn Hernandez and Tamika Huston?  Of course not.  They’re people of color.  As a result, they don’t get the press attention that missing white women receive.  And in “missing persons” situations, widespread media attention can make the difference between life and death, simply because more people will be on the lookout for you.

According to the second link, Tamika Huston’s parents hired a press agent to get the story of their missing daughter out.  And while they made inroads with the local South Carolina press, it barely caused a blip on the national media radar.

Is this racism?  You bet.  Granted, it’s not sheet-wearing spit-on-you kind of racism, but most racism today isn’t that blatent.  It’s the subtle suggestion, often subconscious, that one race is superior—or merits more attention—than others.  A sad commentary on our times.

More Krazy Kristian Kookdom

Ken AshfordGodstuff, IraqLeave a Comment

From the Jackson Hole Star Tribune, via Lizard Queen, we learn of a reprehensible protest. 

A Kansas preacher and gay rights foe whose congregation is protesting military funerals around the country said he’s coming to Idaho on today to picket the memorial for an Idaho National Guard soldier killed in Iraq.

Carrie_french The soldier was 19 year old Carrie French (pictured below) who died last week in Kirkuk, Iraq, when an improvised explosive device (IED) exploded and hit her vehicle.

First of all, you may be wondering why a Wyoming newspaper is covering a story about a Kansas preacher protesting a funeral in Idaho.  Well, the Kansas preacher is none other that the gay-bashing slimeball, “Pastor” Fred Phelps, owner of godhatesfags.com and godhatesamerica.com.  He was thrust into national noteriety when he walked around Laramie, Wyoming, spewing his hatred, during the Matthew Shepard incident and subsequent trial (see, The Laramie Project).  So, Wyoming isn’t exactly crazy about this guy.

Why is gay-hating Phelps protesting at the military funeral of this all-American girl/fallen soldier?

Because he claims that “God killed Cpl. Carrie French with an improvised explosive device in retaliation against the United States for a bombing at Phelps’ church six years ago.”

Now, I know God moves in strange and mysterious ways.  But why would God kill a young girl using an explosive device?  I mean, He’s, you know, God!!  What’s wrong with a good old-fashioned smiting?!?

More importantly, what the hell did Carrie French have to do with the (alleged) bombing of Phelps’ church 6 years ago?

These questions are, of course, rhetorical.  There is no reasonable answer, but I mention it to demonstrate that the hatred and bile that passes for theology from these douchebags is so random and nonsensical.

I don’t know what the afterlife holds for me, but I hope I get a ringside seat when Phelps’ judgement day comes, and he has to meet God face-to-face.  I think there will be a special place in Hell for this piece of excrement, not to mention his followers and supporters.

Your Life’s Theme Song

Ken AshfordWeb RecommendationsLeave a Comment

Go here, enter your your birth date, and find out what was the #1 song on the charts for that day.

Alternatively, you can determine your “life’s theme song” by entering the date of your 18th birthday.

My birth song? “Sherry” (The Four Seasons)

My life’s theme song?  “Upside Down” (Diana Ross).  Ummmm . . . okay . . . uh . . . no comment.