I'm reading this sentiment a lot these past few days:
In fact, Sarah Palin was more qualified to be vice-president than Caroline Kennedy is to be a Senator.
Well, duh! Seriously, the only qualification to being vice-president is to have a pulse. (The stickier issue, and one that dogged Sarah Palin, is that the vice-president could conceivably become president, and for that, Sarah Palin was less qualified than me).
But the notion that Ms. Palin is even in the same league as Ms. Kennedy is a joke. Just do a thought experiment. Put the two of them onstage side-by-side discussing matters of policy. On any political subject; your choice. You know Sarah would do? Winky-winky and talk all folksy about how they do things in Wasilla, you betcha.
Kennedy, on the other hand, would actually speak to the issues. She's intelligent and coherent. What's more, I think Kennedy would (unlike Palin) be able to articulate the specific things she wants to do in public office.
Is Kennedy inexperienced as an elected representative? Sure. But so was her Uncle Bobby and Hillary Clinton, both of whom occupied that same Senate seat.