I’m a little pressed for time today, so I won’t indulge in much analysis and background. I’m sure many are familiar with the story anyway. So instead, I’ll just link to an article, and pose a couple of questions:
(1) Has Bush’s military record been adequately and fully explained?
and the biggie . . .
(2) Is it relevant, and if so, why and how much? Is this just an attempt at a political "gotcha", or does it go to serious issues of credibility?
I note that the administration line is "This has all been answered 4 years ago", but Gore didn’t really go after Bush on his military record (in part because Gore’s claim that "he was shot at" during the war was itself dubious).
Update to earlier post: Arianna Huffington is joining the "Dump Cheney" rumor mill.
Totally off-topic but amusing: Daily Kos has unearthed what those satellite photos of Iraqi installations really were . . .